User talk:JacobNassif

Your submission at Articles for creation: Darren Palmer (November 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Darren Palmer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Darren Palmer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Darren_Palmer Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CASSIOPEIA&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Darren_Palmer reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:06, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Blocked
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ian.thomson (talk) 07:15, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Undisclosed paid editing is a violation of our site's terms and conditions. Ian.thomson (talk) 07:15, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Request to unblock user and 'Darren Palmer' page
If you make another request, please follow the instructions in the block notice to choose a new username, so the request is properly formatted. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 02:23, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Request to unblock JDNAScreative and follow the rules correctly in editing Darren Palmer draft

 * That's not what I meant, I meant that your new choice of "JacobNassif" is acceptable. You cannot continue to use your current name.  If you don't wish to use your real name, you can choose something else that indicates an individual is using this account. 331dot (talk) 09:49, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Someone else will review your request, but we have no way of knowing when you are "on the clock" at work for your client or "off the clock" working on a non-work related project for your client. You still need to comply with WP:COI and WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 09:51, 1 December 2018 (UTC)


 * As 331dot has clarified that it is the username JacobNassif that is acceptable, not JDNAScreative, I have globally renamed JDNAScreative to JacobNassif. Someone else will review your unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:21, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

See how the request to unblock JacobNassif is going
JacobNassif (talk) 23:16, 6 December 2018 (UTC)Hi Wikipedia team. Hope all is well. My name is now changed to JacobNassif and I am happy to have this. I do understand I will need to follow the rules, WP:COI and WP:PAID moving forward for the Darren Palmer profile. If my profile will not be blocked, is it best for Darren Palmer himself to complete the Wikipedia page? If this is something you strongly wish not for me to continue with, I am happy to work on an alternative solution: I have spoken to Darren Palmer about this issue, and he said he is happy to continue working on the page if it is easier for both parties. Thank you. Jacob.JacobNassif (talk) 23:16, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Darren Palmer would need to conform to the policy on autobiographical edits(which can be read at WP:AUTO) which isn't that much different than the conflict of interest policy that applies to you. They shouldn't edit the article about themselves directly. Wikipedia has little interest in what an article subject wants to say about themselves, only in what independent reliable sources state about them.  It is extremely difficult for an article subject to forget everything they know about themselves and only write based on the content of independent sources.  It is possible, but 95% of people can't really do it. People naturally write favorably about themselves. 331dot (talk) 23:32, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

See how the request to unblock JacobNassif is going
JacobNassif (talk) 05:16, 10 December 2018 (UTC)I understand that it would be better for someone else to create Darren Palmer's profile. I am completely happy to follow the guidelines and are aware that I will be required to implement WP:COI and WP:PAID moving forward. In saying that, I am worried that my profile will not be unblocked, and fear that my plea to be unblocked will not end in my favour. In this case, what should I do with the page that has been created? I could ask someone else to complete the Darren Palmer page: that is not a friend, not affiliated with Darren Palmer, and doesn't work for him, but am worried also that Wikipedia will not have faith in this alternative option. If my profile remains blocked for good, could I use the Darren Palmer page I have created and get someone else who is completely not affiliated with Darren Palmer to complete it? It would be someone who is willing to do it out of their own free will, and no other intention. Otherwise, if you could let me know what else I need to do to rectify this issue? Thank you for your time and I am sorry if this is taking too much of your time. Cheers, Jacob.JacobNassif (talk) 05:16, 10 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Please give an indication of what you would do on Wikipedia if unblocked. Huon (talk) 02:15, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I would add that if you are only here to edit about Darren Palmer, you aren't going to be unblocked. Wikipedia does not have "profiles" like social media, Wikipedia has articles. Wikipedia has no interest in Darren Palmer's internet presence or what he/his representatives want to say about him. You will need to agree to not edit about him or other clients in order to be unblocked; if you don't wish to do that, there's nothing more to be done here. 331dot (talk) 07:41, 2 July 2019 (UTC)