User talk:Jacob Henley/sandbox

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? -Yes, everything seems to be relevant to me but nothing distracted me Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? -No its was recently updated this past June and I don't see anything missing What else could be improved? -Nothing Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? -The article provides an unbiased informative view Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? -All seem to be represented equally to me Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? -Yes all the links work and each cite supports the article in one way or another Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? -Yes all have a reliable reference What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? -Just one person who is still confused on what the theory is How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? - There is no rating, there were 3 Wiki projects How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? - The discussions are pretty closely related