User talk:Jacob Lundberg

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! TheRetroGuy (talk) 21:09, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

How not to undelete an article.
Calling the deleting admin "ignorant" is a good way to be ignored. Saying that you don't have time to either find the correct venue for undeletion or participate in a "lengthy discussion" on the subject is another way. I've asked Chrislk02 to reconsider the grounds for deletion, but if they don't, your only other available path is to take the time to make the case for the article without insulting other editors.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:45, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Jacob Lundberg! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:39, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Per Schlingmann -

Arbcom notice: 1953 Iranian coup POV
You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Arbitration/Requests and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
 * Arbitration/Requests;
 * Arbitration guide.

Thanks, Binksternet (talk) 16:54, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Swedish organizations by number of members


The article List of Swedish organizations by number of members has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:NOTE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 13:54, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Swedish Free Enterprise Foundation listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Swedish Free Enterprise Foundation. Since you had some involvement with the Swedish Free Enterprise Foundation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 04:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Swedish organizations by number of members for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Swedish organizations by number of members is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Swedish organizations by number of members until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Triptothecottage (talk) 02:51, 18 March 2017 (UTC)