User talk:Jacobbeierle/sandbox

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? •	You didn’t even get to the treatment section (I can only tell because there’s no citations) •	Typos o	In the mechanisms section, therefor is spelled wrong o	“Nicotine medications and alcohol” sentence in mechanisms section might need a semicolon after dosages instead of a comma? •	Are there any treatments with amphetamine withdrawal? Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? •	Very neutral Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? •	no Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? •	Except Henry Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? •	There seems to be no bias •	Look at reference 22. Why isn’t there a link? •	Reference 11,18: Henry. Needs. To. Go. •	Is eMedicine peer reviewed? Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added? •	Henry

-Sema

Jake - “Causes” - best heading title? - Typo - “With regular exposure TO the drug used by the mother” - Typo - “and thereforE the end of drug exposure” - Reduce size of subheadings under Signs and Symptoms (they are not all the same size) - - Distinction between Pharmacological Treatment section vs. Medication section? - Move information under Supportive section to Non-Pharmacological Treatment section, maybe - Move Complications section to beginning of page, before Causes even. Emphasizes importance of page - Move Epidemiology section to beginning of page, after Complications ^GREG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gswirak (talk • contribs) 21:32, 21 November 2017 (UTC)