User talk:Jacobjgreen

January 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Judd Lander has been reverted. Your edit here to Judd Lander was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.discogs.com/John-Lennon-Rock-N-Roll/master/72981, https://www.discogs.com/Culture-Club-Karma-Chameleon/release/492037, https://www.discogs.com/Culture-Club-Church-Of-The-Poison-Mind/release/6306936, https://www.discogs.com/Paul-McCartney-Flowers-In-The-Dirt/release/6335813) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:04, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Judd Lander
In this edit to Judd Lander, you included an edit summary stating "IT KEEPS UNSAVING SO THIS IS THE 3RD TIME !!!!". Your changes are being undone because they are unsourced (Wikipedia requires that biographies of living persons be especially carefully sourced). You will need to find reliable sources to add the text you want to add. Also, you have added external links that one of Wikipedia's maintenance bots has found to be invalid, so you were reverted for that reason as well. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:37, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Judd Lander have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Your edit here to Judd Lander was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.discogs.com/The-The-Infected/release/1456586, https://www.discogs.com/Aswad-Rebel-Souls/release/1597773) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:22, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello
PLEASE read this, your talk page, and pay attention to the edit summaries--click the "View history" tab on the article page. And please maybe practice editing Wikipedia first... Drmies (talk) 15:19, 16 January 2020 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, but you leave me no choice. If you have not read this talk page, you are not equipped to edit in a collaborative environment. If you have read this but ignored it, ditto. I am going to block you to prevent further disruption: it'll be temporarily, to give you time to read over our guidelines and the comments here, and it will be lifted the moment you indicate that you know and understand what is going on. Drmies (talk) 16:47, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 16:48, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello Jacobjgreen. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jacobjgreen. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Praxidicae (talk) 17:20, 16 January 2020 (UTC)