User talk:Jacobrubinovitz

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get | live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Mephistophelian  (contact)  10:35, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

I want to submit the article now. What to do?

Welcome!
{| width="100%" style="background:transparent"
 * style="width: 50%; border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top"|

Discusion on 23/12/20012
References were added following the reviewer remarks. I want to resubmit the article now. What to do? In fact, the article was resubmitted for review.
 * }

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 19:39, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Jacobrubinovitz (talk) 19:05, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 07:57, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
Please do not write or add to an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jacobrubinovitz. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. SarahStierch (talk) 07:57, 23 December 2012 (UTC) Jacobrubinovitz 09:51, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Re: Menny Rabinovich
I noticed that you keep adding AFC submission tags to Menny Rabinovich. The article has already been approved and exists in mainspace; it doesn't need to go through the AFC process again. I noticed also that you introduced three different spellings of the subject's name into the article: the spelling that has been approved is "Menny Rabinovich"; if you think a different spelling should be used, you should make a case for that on the article's talk page, which you can find here. Finally, you should be aware that academic titles such as "Dr" and trademarks such as "®" shouldn't be used on Wikipedia, except in a few very limited cases. See WP:CREDENTIAL and MOS:TM. Don't forget that you can visit the Teahouse if you need any help editing. Alexrexpvt (talk) 15:39, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Menny Rabinovich for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Menny Rabinovich is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Menny Rabinovich until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Alexrexpvt (talk) 16:11, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Israeli multi-scientists


A tag has been placed on Category:Israeli multi-scientists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for four days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jacobrubinovitz 00:37, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  DGG ( talk ) 02:20, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Menahem Rabinovich, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! BO &#124; Talk 15:23, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

March 2013
Please stop adding a birth to the events section of September 6. Births are not classified as events. If you have questions please ask. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 19:00, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jacob Rubinovitz, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 19:11, 28 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Let's have a discussion about your work here and how you can accomplish what you wish to accomplish. One suggestion I'll make at the start is that you should request a username change.  Your username is in violation of our username policy because it is the name of a real person and that person is not you.  Changing it will help to alleviate some of the conflict of interest concerns.  We should address those separately.  If you do not engage in discussion, your edits may be considered disruptive and you could be blocked from editing.  -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 19:33, 28 March 2013 (UTC)


 * I will contemplate a name change Jacobrubinovitz 20:03, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Contemplation is not appropriate in this case. Per WP:IMPERSONATE I strongly suggest that your next edit be at WP:CHU or here on this page to discuss your intentions in editing in general.  -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 20:42, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * It looks like you were confused. Click on WP:CHU.  Follow the instructions there to request a new username.  -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 20:56, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * please change my article name from Jacob Rubinovitz to Dr. Jacob Rubinovitz Thanks Jacobrubinovitz 21:17, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * That wouldn't be appropriate. Prefixes are not used in article titles.  The username change is different from the article name.  Your username is presently Jacobrubinovitz.  You can't use that name unless you are Jacob Rubinovitz.  That's what you need to change at WP:CHU.  -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 21:31, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I changed my username as required.Thanks 93.173.148.148 (talk) 21:45, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Clearly you didn't if you are still editing under this username. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 22:07, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I do not want to argue. There is not and was not disruptive editing. Please remove the blockade. Jacobrubinovitz 08:53, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

This account is blocked from editing per the warnings at User talk:Sagi Rubin. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 11:03, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Please remove the block of user Jacobrubinovitz, or clearly state the reason for not doing so. Jacobrubinovitz 08:35, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Menahem Rabinovich, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Israeli and Fellowship (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Please remove the block on user Jacobrubinovitz
There was no disruptive editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.181.171.47 (talk) 14:08, 30 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Reviewing admin: See also User:Ofer Rubin and User:Sagi Rubin.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:49, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * To get unblocked you'll need to do the following:
 * Show that you will change your username and that you understand why using someone else's name as your username is not acceptable per policy.
 * Give an example of some of the actions that were seen as disruptive and explain why they came across to others as disruptive.
 * Explain what type of editing you will do once you are unblocked.
 * Promise that you will edit under one account and one account only.
 * I would also recommend that you go through a training module like WP:TRAINING or WP:ADVENTURE as a sign of good faith on your part. My concern here is basically that you are pretty aware of guidelines per the conversations on the other pages, but you don't particularly care. You seem to be more interested in editing as it suits you rather than if it suits Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  11:32, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Plaese change my name from Jacobrubinovitz to Jacob.Rubinovitz I understand that my editing history and my Password will be kept. This change is necessary to remove the block on Jacobrubinovitz and his IP. I Promise not to use user names Sagi Rubin and Ofer Rubin. I will do no disruptive editing. I will use my account only to submit articles or add new content.I will use my New Name Only.

Jacobrubinovitz 04:28, 17 December 2015 (UTC)


 * I'm going to go ahead and cut off talk page access. This is a clear case of someone willfully refusing to get the point, which has been made exceedingly clear. Any further unblock requests must be submitted via e-mail, during which time you can prove your identity, if you are Rubinovitz. If you are not, they will not unblock you until you choose a username that does not use another person's name. Even then you will still have to show that you understand the reasons why your other edits were seen as disruptive. And just so this is explicitly clear, your block covers your edits under any format. You are not supposed to edit at all, whether it be under an IP or another account. Any attempts to edit without successfully having this account unblocked will be seen as block evasion or (if you open up any further accounts) as WP:SOCKPUPPETRY. Five unblock requests, none of which show that you understand the reason for your block, are more than enough. At this point it's just a waste of admin time to allow it to go any further. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:16, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:17, 19 December 2015 (UTC)