User talk:Jacoplane/archive8

Unification Church
There is a user "Uncle Ed" who is deleting whole sections of my edits on the Unification Church page. I agree that I need to improve my edits and I will as time goes by. But I do not think it is fair to deleted whole sections. Why is it that a admitted Unification Church member like Uncle Ed can dominate the article the way he does? I know that religion is a difficult, and tedious area and I opologize for making your work more difficult, but I do feel the article needs to be more balanced.

Thank you for your help Marknw 16:25, 16 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Yes, please stop me if I get carried away with Text move of sections I see as poorly written. It's dreadfully difficult for one to be objective or impartial concerning one's own religion (or ex-religion? ;-) so any help from a third party will be much appreciated. I don't want to dominate the article, but merely be a co-contributor. As we say to our Korean elders in the church, "Please give me much guidance." :-) --Uncle Ed 15:44, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

I feel Ed and I have come to an understanding and I feel good about our progress. Thank you Ed for being so good about it. Thank you as well Jacoplane for your help. With Regards Marknw 18:30, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Hey
I just reverted a few edits to the Alizee article regarding info about her new single and album, because I couldn't find any verification for that. However, I am bringing this to your notice so that if you see any media coverage, you will know you have a reversion to undo. :-)

And oh, all the best for Netherlands today. -- soum সৌমো yasch  17:09, 16 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I know it was some anon ip, which, I believed wasn't you (becuase of the style of language). I just requested you to keep half an eye (well maybe quarter since you probably are be glued to the TV) for any confirmation of the removed info and revert me in case you come across something that shows I'm wrong. Sorry if my other message gave any impression otherwise. And cheers, Holland won :-) -- soum সৌমো yasch  19:05, 16 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I was editing from my phone when I wrote the original comment. Typing using a cell keypad is cumbersome so I kept the message as short as I could. What I didn't notice that it lacked context and hence appeared to disseminate a different meaning than what I intended. My apologies for that. Hope you didn't mind. Sorry, again. Btw, how's your mom? Hope she's better. -- soum সৌমো yasch  19:17, 16 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Hey, hope you are not offended by the seemingly rude-sounding message, something which was never my intention. -- soum সৌমো yasch  04:51, 17 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Insulting anyone personally for their professional actions &mdash; isn't it enough to warrant a negative judgement about actions? :P I noew know what quality it takes to be a great leader of the wikipedians, who leads with diligence and kindness. Maximum respects, bro! This is for you.


 * Its fine with me. I was only bothered about numbers. -- soum সৌমো yasch  09:28, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Football AID 18 June - 24 June
Thank you for participating in the Football AID vote this week. Netherlands national football team has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.

Islamophobia
Jacoplane, thanks for the de-protection. I'm going to lay low for a few days on that article and let others have a crack at it but I still feel fairly strongly about my previously reverted edits. Any suggestions from you regarding that? Netscott 17:40, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

2006 FIFA World Cup - spam links
Please don't remove the template from 2006 FIFA World Cup. The whole point of it is to discourage people from adding spam links and to encourage other users to remove it when it appears. Poeple have been constantly adding all sorts of spam links to the page and we keep having to remove them. See Sudoku for similar usage. Jooler 01:17, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I disagree with the usage of the template when there are not actually any spam links there. Using a comment in the code is ok, but this is just rather unprofessional. How difficult is it really to clean out all the spam links once a day. I've done it a number of times, no big deal. But I'm rather busy at the moment and I'm sure you won't agree and this could turn into a long pointless discussion, which I don't have time for, so if you realy want to keep it go ahead. I just wanted to say I don't think it's a good idea. Cheers, jaco ♫ plane  01:24, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Well I've had to remove spam about 4 times in the last week. But on some occasions its difficult to decide what is and what isn't a spam link and such discussions can also turn into long winded arguments. They have a policy about external links on the Sudoku page and it works well and I suggested such myself on the talk:2006 FIFA World Cup page. There are about another 500 odd pages that also use the template. Jooler 01:58, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Re: User talk:65.95.147.108
Dear Jacoplane,

When searching Wikipedia earlier, I saw that there was an orange bar on top of my screen with something addressed to the viewer of the page. Clicking the link, I found this text for the URL http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:65.95.147.108&redirect=no:

"Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Riot, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jacoplane 20:52, 8 February 2006 (UTC) Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Riot, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. KurtRaschke 20:53, 8 February 2006 (UTC)"

I'm very sorry for this confusion, but I (user C_vasilevski) have never contributed or edited a page in Wikipedia before. I just became a member to address this concern. The IP address 65.95.95.147.108 was mentioned in the title for this page. I'm worried that what may have happened is that I may have been the victim of a hacker - is it possible for my computer to be unknowingly used in this manner by anyone else? I'd appreciate your help in solving this.

Thanks.

Inconsistensies and political interests
Is there a particular reason why the PKK, a terrorist group recognized by the USA and the EU, is not allowed to be listed as a terrorist group on Wikipedia and is sugar-coated as a "militant group" why while the "Holfstad network" is listed as a "Islamist terrorist organization"? One has killed thousands of people and is clearly labeled as a terrorist group by the USA and the EU (that includes the Dutch!). The other is a group that has threatened a group of Dutch Islamophobes. I think its clear which is more likely to be labeled a terrorist group by a long shot.

There seems to be a concentrated effort by some here to revise articles to make it seem like there is no such thing as suffering Muslims or Muslim victims in the world.

And yes, Islamophobia exists. You only need to live in the US a few days to notice there are actually people who hate Muslims because of their religion. http://www.un.org/Pubs/chronicle/2005/issue1/0105p30.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rigobert Song (talk • contribs)


 * I have been active in the Islamophobia article, but mainly in the role of Wikipedia Administrator, and I have tried to get people who disagree to collaborate effectively, and to overcome disagreements. Nowhere have I said that Islamophobia does not exist. Regarding the PKK and the Hofstad Group, you have to understand that Wikipedia does not define what certain groups are: we only use information from reliable sources and cover that. So when Mohammed Bouyeri killed Theo van Gogh as a member of the Hofstad Group, many media outlets, including Arabic and Turkish ones reported that this was a terrorist organisation. Therefore Wikipedia describes them as such. We are encyclopedists, not historians or journalists. We do not have the qualification or the inclination to decide on such issues. Regarding the status of the PKK, I am not an expert but again our policies of following reliable secondary sources is appropriate. You need to lobby organisations like the BBC or the New York Times, not Wikipedia, if you want to see a real change here. Hope that answers your questions. Regards, jaco ♫ plane  00:29, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Squad Template Adding Privileges
Also, why have the two most successful Turkish clubs, as far as their record in European competition, (Galatasaray SK and Trabzonspor) not had a squad template added to them? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rigobert Song (talk • contribs)


 * I have created a number of the footbal templates, but you do not need any special permission to create and add them. If you want to create a similar template for Galatasaray, go ahead. If you need a hand please don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Cheers, jaco ♫ plane  16:52, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Featured article
Hey see this. Its less than 30 KB, still an FA? We may use this when we take Alizee for an FA run. -- soum সৌমো yasch  15:14, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Hi
Havent seen ur name on my watchlist for quite a long time. So just dropped in to say Hi. -- soum সৌমো yasch  18:55, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Hope your mom is fine. -- soum সৌমো yasch  17:09, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry for bringig it up in public. I am sorry IRC is blocked in my college, and hence cant use it. Do u use IMs like MSN or Yahoo?

Image:Bush dehoopscheffer.jpg
Howdy! Whilst editing, I came across the image Bush dehoopscheffer.jpg, which you uploaded with a PD-USGov notice. From the subject and appearance of the photograph I'm inclined to believe you on this, but you haven't stated a source for the image. I figured I'd post a friendly query before someone adds the rather ugly Image source notice to your talk page. If you can remember where you found teh image, please consider updating the image description page with the information :) GeeJo (t)⁄(c) &bull; 01:51, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

International Squad Templates
Just said I would tell you about this. A trend has started on wikipedia lately of doing each country's world cup squad going back for years. This is turning into a bit of a problem as certain players have played in numerous world cups. Just look at Paolo Maldini

My solution is redoing these international templates with a "Hide" features. I've done a very basic job on one of them below.

World Cup Squads

I'm not as yet able to add the country's flags or increase the size of the writing. I'm not able to change the colour of "Hide" either. Just wondering if you want to have a go at improving it so it can be used in articles ?

If you want to contribute please post your replies at the discussion section at Template:World Cup Squads as there could be a number of people contributing to this.

Thanks

Niall123 18:56, 22 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The only reason I put the discussion there is becuase I had to open a new page to host the squad template. I'll leave a message over there aswell though. Niall123 22:10, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Template main
Hi, I'm not an admin so I can't revert, but would you mind opening your changes to a discussion before making the change? Main is seen across thousands of articles and has been a very touchy topic with many people - see the discussion page. Your proposal is just one of dozens that have come along to "improve" it, but really, most people just want a simple look that is as unobtrusive the text as possible. I for one have stopped using the template because it has been so unstable and keeps changing every time someone has a new style idea. -- Stbalbach 15:33, 11 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Oh no problem hope your computer is ok sorry I jumped too quickly. Could I ask a small favor to add this line:
 * ..to the template Template:1911 per the request Template_talk:1911?
 * --Stbalbach 17:45, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * --Stbalbach 17:45, 11 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Thank you. --Stbalbach 02:23, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Link
Shoot...not my intention. Did you open that link? Paul Hempstead 22:30, 11 August 2006 (UTC)


 * With the "Hey, everybody, I'm looking at gay porno!" and everything? Paul Hempstead 22:36, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the warning. Thunderbrand 15:11, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip
I'll keep that in mind for future new articles. :) --Tristam 01:20, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1701
I noticed that you've tagged the article with a "move to Wikisource" tag. However, please note that this text cannot be moved to Wikisource, as it is the accepted draft but not the final text. There is a space already reserved for the final resolution as soon as UN has published it, and when that text is in place we will of course remove the draft text and link the article to the Wikisource text instead. Please see Talk:United Nations Security Council Resolution 1701 where this course of action was outlined several hours ago. In the meantime I'll remove the tag, in order to prevent ambitious people who haven't read the talk page, from getting the idea that they should reformat the current text and insert it in Wikipedia. Best regards Thomas Blomberg 22:44, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Islamophobia related ANI post
Hello Jacoplane. Could you take a look at this ANI post about ? Thanks. (→ Netscott ) 14:12, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar
Hi, thanks for my barnstar! I'm very proud of it and will prominently display it on my user page! Timkovski 13:29, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

3RR commentary
Your input on 's 3RR report was appreciated. Thanks. (→ Netscott ) 17:04, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Wikify dates in references
Hi, just curious. Why did you removed the date links from refs in Ayaan Hirsi Ali. I coudn't really find anything about it on the WP:Mos, but doesn't the same count here as with the other date links, that people can see the date according to their preferences? Cheers, Garion96 (talk) 19:52, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Hope you indeed don't mind but I put them back. It just reads weird to me that I see everything 1 Januari and then later I see Januari 1. Good job on cleaning up those refs btw. Cheers, Garion96 (talk) 20:11, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Interesting. I never recieved a message at the same time that I wrote a message to the same person....:) Garion96 (talk) 20:12, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

3RR
You don't understand WP:3RR, it doesn't matter what Netscott was trying to do, the fact was he purposefully "undoing the actions of another editor or other editors in whole or part" at least 4 times in a 24 hour period.

Please don't interfere with 3RR noticeboard in future if you don't understand the policy. And don't try to take sides in the debate on the noticeboard either. Deuterium 00:37, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Admin coaching
Hey! Thanks for signing up in Esperanza's Admin coaching program. Since you've volunteered to help train a user, I've assigned Quentin Smith to you and to your partner, Titoxd. Please make sure to be kind and helpful to your coachee. If you have any questions, let me know. Thanks again! Petros471 17:06, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * As Quentin Smith has gone inactive at the moment, are you happy to take on a new trainee? Petros471 11:11, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Quentin is now asking about starting admin coaching. Did you take a new trainee, or are you ready to start now? (I'm ready, so if you are, just tell him on his talk that we can start anytime.) Tito xd (?!?) 18:57, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Thankyou for the barnstar!
Thank you so much for the barn star, just now - I really appreciate it. You've just made my day. :) RandyWang ( chat me up/fix me up ) 21:50, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

FC Barcelona
Thank you for your kind words and support at Talk:FC Barcelona Djln--Djln 18:52, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Is it possible for you to investigate the behaviour of User:83.1992.2006 or request that someone else does. This person is really spoiling my enjoyment of Wiki. His behaviour is well documented at Talk:FC Barcelona and at his own user page. He has now started to mess with other articles including Copa del Rey and Athletic Bilbao. I also think he has been masquerading under other names and anonymously. In my opinion he should be banned. I have not come across a single article that he has made a positive impact on. Djln--Djln 00:16, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you for protecting articles mentioned above. I think the para below, which he posted himself, just gives u a small sample of what this editor is like. Djln--Djln 15:03, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Trophies section is perfect and Athletic has 23 Cups not 24, may be you should check the 6 links I gave you in Barça talk page and in your own talk page. Djln should be banned not me. Im just well informed. The most stupid football fan in Spain knows that Athletic has 23 Cups and not 24, but of course Djln don't knows too much about spanish football. 83.1992.2006

Statistics for Dutch players
Unfortunately I have to admit that I found it incredibly tough to get statistics for Dirk Kuyt! You know where I started, and that I had problems finding Dutch Cup details. I was getting his goals by simply counting the number of times Kuyt (or Kuijt) featured on the rsssf.com pages. The only source I have for the full statistics is lfchistory.net. Thankfully Liverpool FC is served by this wonderful site! Boulahrouz may be incredibly tough to source appearances and goals for if you don't luck out in a similar way that I did with Kuyt... sorry I can't be more helpful. aLii 20:18, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Harassment
Why do you insist on harassing me?

If you want to contribute to the section that you are posting in, feel free.

But, as you say, if you can't be bothered learning about the dispute and just want to make personal attacks, please stop. Deuterium 01:56, 22 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Although I'm not sure what this dispute is about, if you'll bear with me I might suggest that you look at Wikipedia less as a battlefield where you have enemies and allies. There is no need to leave intimidating messages on people's talk pages. We are all here to remove the curse that is the veil of ignorance that shrouds the world. I respect your point of view even if I disagree with you. The point of Wikipedia is that we can use civil discourse to reach an understanding and to increase mutual respect and understanding. Please make an effort to take a less unilateral point of view, since this method of advocating your viewpoint is more likely to estrange you from other Wikipedians than to enable you to collaborate with them on improving the encyclopedia. Which is after all the point of engaging this community in the first place... Take care, jaco ♫ plane  01:45, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I am somewhat dissapointed that you view my message, which was intended to be friendly, not hostile, as "harrassment". However, you do not have the right to delete comments by other users from your talk page. You can archive the comments once they have reached a conclusion, but you cannot just delete them. Please note that there is broad consensus for this ettiquette in the community. jaco ♫ plane  01:55, 22 August 2006 (UTC)


 * What do you think about User:Jayjg deleting my friendly comments on his talk page (see above) then? I don't see you reverting User:Jayjg's talk page. Fact is, there is not a "broad consensus" about this issue; many people routinely remove comments from their talk page and unless you have anything constructive to add rather than a pointless personal attack which is irrelevant to this section then I will remove your comments and I have every right to. Deuterium 01:57, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Here, if you want to talk about this so much, we can talk about it on your page, since you're the one with the issues. Deuterium 01:59, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The reason I decided to comment on your talk page is that I have followed you since you left that message on my talk page. I thought that you might welcome some advice on how to engage disputes in the community since you seem to be having some problems getting acceptance for your contributions. I have little interest in embroiling myself in this particular dispute, and if my comments are not welcome, you are more than free to tell me so. I never meant to stalk you, I just though that engaging in some kind of dialogue in order to achieve understanding is better than resentment. Anyway, I mean you no harm, and I hope that in the future we'll be able to collaborate constructively together. Anyway, might I suggest that saying "you're the one with the issues" is not really an appropriate means of dialoge. Also, you are mistaken with regard to the user page policy, but I will explain that to you in more detail in the near future. I have to go, so we'll have to continue this dialogue later. jaco ♫ plane  02:08, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Also, I promise to have a look at User:Jayjg's talk page when I get the chance. I'll back you up if there was inappropriate behabiour there. jaco ♫ plane  02:11, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I await your opinion regarding Jayjg's talk page with bated breath. :-) Deuterium 02:19, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

FCB 2
Is it possible that protection status can be amended on this page to allow editors with a proven record to edit. For example the 2006 Supercopa de España needs to be added. I would nominate Bcnviajero, Jacoplane, Raymond Cruise, Abreuzinho, Andromeda and Sam Korn and myself in this category. There are probably others I have missed. I do not want to discourage User:83.1992.2006, The Supersheriff and anonymous editors from getting involved, but I think editors need to prove themselves by actually writing a few articles. Djln

This why I think User:83.1992.2006 should be banned. After I request him to stop abuse, this was his response. Below is an extract from his own talk page;


 * Please can you refrain from adding offensive insults to your edits. I work with adults who have learning disabilties and find your comments very offensive. If you cannot have a debate without being abusive then I will have to report you to the Wikipedia authorities and request that you are banned. Djln --Djln 23:53, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Working or being part of them?


 * What kind of lowlife are you to post a comment like that? Have you no shame?  --Bcnviajero 19:25, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Correct case of harassment
Given that I have been editing Wikipedia for over two years, have made over 40,000 edits, have been an administrator for almost two years, have been a member of the Arbitration Committee for over a year, I'm pretty clear on what harassment is or isn't (and what is or isn't great about Wikipedia, for that matter). My Talk: page makes it clear that people should post comments about articles on article Talk: pages for discussion by everyone where they belong, not on my own Talk: page, and that posts which do not follow that rule may be removed. Knowing this, Deuterium posted questions about article content to my page anyway - questions to which he full well knew the answer. When I removed them for obvious reasons, he trolled my Talk: page again. Then he convinced you to do so on his behalf. Jayjg (talk) 23:02, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I haven't let anything go to my head, I'm pointing out that I have a great deal of experience with Wikipedia, and that Arbitration Committee experience is invaluable to understanding harassment. I know harassment when I see it, and I know misuse of Talk: page when I see it, and there's not point in putting up with either. Given that you know little of the actual series of events that led up to the incident you referred to, it probably would have been best had you not commented at all; given that you have commented more than once now, compounding this issue, it would probably be best if you commented on it no further. Regarding your kind invitation to IRC, I appreciate it, but I avoid IRC, as I find the kinds of conversations conducted there are generally not condusive to Wikilove. Jayjg (talk) 15:42, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

re: RfA and barnstar
Hey, thanks man! I admit I have been neglecting the CVG project since I started WikiProject Guitarists. And of course, all those admin backlogs keep a body busy. :) -- Aguerriero  ( talk ) 03:06, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

FCB
If possible could you update FC Barcelona trophies to included 2006 Supercopa de España win. Djln--Djln 19:46, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Fenerbahçe SK
There are some people who keep removing parts of the article over and over, even after I revert. I was wondering if you could semi-protect the page. Thanks &mdash;Canbek - 张 - Esen 10:44, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

GCOTW
I know, I don't like it either. But the editor never removed it, even under all the complaints. I wouldn't be suprised if it is sent to AfD. Anyway, should I just change it to Captain Falcon?Thunderbrand 00:28, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Current events
Hi, with regards to the 61st Annual Meetings, today is actually the first of two days whereby the main plenary session are being held. The last day will be tomorrow (20th Sept) What may be of note, instead, was the greenlight given for major reforms in the IMF on 18th September .--Huaiwei 07:36, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

hey kid
I just saw your contrib on an articvle I watch and wanted to say hi :-) (Remember me maybe from having gone to Ecolint as well). -FateSmiled&amp;DestinyLaughed 13:43, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Templating
Please hold off on the WikiProject templating for the moment, or at least until you've read this: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Musicians. I have serious concerns about the scope overlap of your Project with other projects (including Electronic Music, KLF, Beatles, but most notably WPBiography; the scope overlap could run into tens of thousands of articles). It seems to me that the best solution is to be part of WPBiography and share a template. --kingboyk 14:26, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 * It's pretty much all done now mate, so if you want to carry on where you left off that would be great. There's no need for you to backtrack though as I fixed up the templates you'd placed. More details at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Musicians. --kingboyk 23:24, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

CVG Barnstar
Thanks for the Barnstar, Jaco! Much appreciated. :) I may indeed seem crazy, but really I just don't like red links. Especially when following a bunch of blue ones. Ugh. You understand. --ADeveria 23:26, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Galatasaray article
On the page of Galatasaray i saw a mistake but i cannot revert it becauce the page is under protection, in the Managerial area Yılmaz Gökdel was the manager in 1974-1975 season could you fix this?

http://www.webaslan.com/kulup/antrenor.php this is the official site of Galatasaray here it says that Gokdel is coach for the 74-75 season :)

Johnny200 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Portal:Current events/Video gaming/In the news
This sentence "This year Nintendo did not attend, last year being one of the rare exceptions." doens't really make a lot of sense I think. I'm not sure what you were trying to say so I did't edit it. Just thought I'd let you know. Chris M. 16:00, 26 September 2006 (UTC)