User talk:Jacqueline1961

Image copyright problem with Image:MarkWorrall.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:MarkWorrall.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:47, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:MarkWorrall.JPG
Hi Jacqueline1961!

We thank you for uploading Image:MarkWorrall.JPG, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation. This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 16:24, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Mark Worrall
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Mark Worrall, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.overlandandsea.net/homepage.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Mark Worrall and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Mark Worrall, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Mark Worrall with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Mark Worrall. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Mark Worrall saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!

Nomination of Mark Worrall for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Worrall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mark Worrall until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dloh cierekim  15:13, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Mark Worrall
Can you come up with some reviews in the UK press apart from the Chelsea coverage? Did the Times write a feature about him? Does the Times have a Best seller list, and is he on it? That would really help a lot. Dloh cierekim  14:24, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * reply hi - before I answer, can I just write one thing which is quite amusing to those of a Chelsea persuasion. (UTC) the coordinated universal time suffix at the end of every message has another meaning in the world of Chelsea - UTC stands for Up The Chels :-) As for "him", the Times have not written a feature, but as I mentioned on the deletion discussion, there seems to be wiki pages for authors who have no notability and zero coverage whatsoever on the internet. The point about this article is that Chelsea FC are one of the worlds most famous football clubs and Mark Worrall is a prolific writer on the topic with a significant body of published work which makes him notable. As for bestsellers, Blue Murder, Chelsea Till I Die has been in the Amazon top ten football books since it was first published in 2007 - that's a notable achievement in itself - that list is also real time. I know the Daily Telegraph is not the Times but as recently as last month Chief Football Correspondent Henry Winter quoted a huge block of text from another recent Worrall publication Henry Winter quotes from Worrall book in Telegraph Dec 2013. Anyway looks like you guys have already made your mind up. Strange though, since this article has been in development for almost six years, not like it's been posted overnight. Jacqueline1961 (talk) 20:19, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Jacqueline1961. Thank you. &#9733;&#9734; DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 03:14, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Blocked
The account has been blocked indefinitely per the findings of Sockpuppet investigations/Jacqueline1961. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:49, 18 January 2014 (UTC)