User talk:Jacqueline1980

Nomination of Johnathan seitler QC for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Johnathan seitler QC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Johnathan seitler QC until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pichpich (talk) 16:59, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Johnathan Seitler QC for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Johnathan Seitler QC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Johnathan Seitler QC until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:09, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Johnathan seitler QC
Hello Jacqueline1980,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Johnathan seitler QC for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article,.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Wgolf (talk) 17:50, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Jacqueline1980


A tag has been placed on User:Jacqueline1980, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Peridon (talk) 18:07, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Johnathan Seitler QC


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Johnathan Seitler QC. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Jonathan Seitler QC. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Jonathan Seitler QC – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Eric  Corbett  15:04, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Plea for retention
You made a plea for the retention of Jonathan Seitler QC (which is presently tagged for speedy deletion as a duplicate article), in part saying:
 * He has worked on some high profile cases and written for Law journals. We are looking for more articles to add to his page but please can you tell me how I can save this page?

Many, many lawyers have "worked on some high profile cases" and written for law journals. This alone does not make them notable. Absent any indication that Seitler has been the subject of significant independent coverage, it is unlikely this article will remain. By significant coverage, we're talking about profiles of him in trade publications or newspaper or magazine articles written about him (and not just about a case he happens to be working on, or articles that happen to use him as a source for a quote). Find some of those in the next 6 days or so, and all might be well. And fear not: if the article at the misspelt name is deleted as a duplicate, but the original article (at Johnathan Seitler QC) is retained, we can always move the article to the proper title. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:03, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

AFD etiquette
When commenting at an Articles for deletion discussion (such as Articles for deletion/Johnathan seitler QC), please add your comments to the bottom of the page so that the discussion can be read in logical chronological order. And please, do not replace the line that says  This template is an important part of the Wikipedia tracking system, and removing it breaks that system. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:30, 5 February 2014 (UTC)