User talk:Jacques206

May 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Cleopatra (band) has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \byoutube\.com (links: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5x0a7qbnklg,, http://www.youtube.com/index?ytsession=dBXxmR2gPF41BKw5XpYRjHI4vkaAHkFZ2xqkON7Xk6uPaxdIDGe7EVcTOAUT73MICS-_1n46Abj8P83m1bugopLZkzKlPzaPF9ovcugTpl0rCdU8sf-Fq3ze2BquxhZaCJDmng86HD4ZdW5rkdvXsWEkR7HLt8obYv8zLBx5lMCJzhPElvVoNsgOYfGcrsk_v-VXL2D8h9XfbRjWd-fAQDltpdbfir3D8mfcHKFaTQVodgYeNnsKMd7DitUY3G-9DlRjBCj5d-jKXw2nfDT5qZ2Ri5rJo80qpvwFbFq5ljre__YCWtYBow (redirect from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5x0a7qbnklg,)). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:58, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Cleopatra promo 2009.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Cleopatra promo 2009.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NellieBly (talk) 04:16, 1 December 2009 (UTC)


 * All media files on Wikipedia servers must exist and be used in accordance with US copyright regulations. Only in very rare instances can images under copyright be used, and this image doesn't fit into any of those rules. Just because a photograph can be found online doesn't mean it's free - this is a very common belief, but it's simply not the case. I invite you to read our policies regarding copyright before uploading any other images. Basically, if you didn't take the photograph yourself, you must be extremely careful when uploading, because using a copyrighted image like this one on Wikipedia could get the project sued by the copyright holder. --NellieBly (talk) 04:22, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)