User talk:Jaderunner1978

March 2019
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 331dot (talk) 10:51, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

I've fixed your request for proper display(you needed to copy it when viewing the notice and then open the edit window, not copy from the edit window). 331dot (talk) 11:12, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

I have renamed your account from Moofaces12, and someone else will review your request. 331dot (talk) 11:13, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Really?!? You still believe that, after reading WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO?!? I think perhaps you should go back and read those policies and modify your unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 11:52, 9 March 2019 (UTC)


 * I've merged your requests; you only need one open request. Further comments should be standard comments without the unblock request formatting(as I am doing). Can you at least understand how it would be difficult to believe that someone with the username "Moofaces" editing about Moofaces is not affiliated with them? 331dot (talk) 13:31, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Of course, when you put it that way! I could agree. But In tech and the Ent. industry what I wrote was important to both people in the industry. When validating ideas on what has been done (known-startups) articles that I added and corrected were 100 percent fact. In fact, I noticed it was listed but somehow deleted I remember seeing it. And multiple cites on Wikipedia pages. I went by the articles major publications and valid sources like Wiki guidelines. I also saw a bunch of other articles on Wiki with incorrect or missing information. Some of the people reviewing them don't have knowledge of the sectors or even live in the industries. Simple google searches would easily correct many of the issues with valid verifiable resources. 331dot (talk)