User talk:Jadewang

ToBI
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of ToBI, and it appears to be a substantial copy of. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:01, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

ToBI
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of ToBI, and it appears to include a substantial copy of. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:12, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of ToBI
An editor has nominated ToBI, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:59, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Regarding your article, ToBI
Hello there! As you know, your article is currently up for deletion for a lack of assertion of notability. What I'd like to propose to you is withdrawing ToBI from the mainspace, where articles are located. Instead, we can set it up in a special subpage of your userspace (such as User:Jadewang/ToBI), and you can work it on there. Then, when you think it's up to par, let me or another administrator know, and we'll review it before moving it back into the mainspace. What do you think? GlassCobra 22:57, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Regarding your article, Nina Kraus
Hello, I wanted to ask you a few things about your article, Nina Kraus. Do you know the person? If so, there is a possible conflict of intrest. This isn't necessarily not allowed, but it is discouraged. However, I can copyedit and make sure the conflict of interest issue is not present. I would also like to encourage you to add the article to categories. This will bring in peers who know something about the topic and may be able to make a better judgment on the notability issue. You do a great job of citing sources. Keep up the good work, and feel free to comment on my talk page if you have questions. Gosox5555 (talk) 01:24, 1 July 2009 (UTC)