User talk:Jadhaddad1982

Speedy deletion of Abdul Majid Shoman
A tag has been placed on Abdul Majid Shoman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. &mdash;  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 04:46, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Abdul Majid Shoman deleted
The article Abdul Majid Shoman has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appeared to have no meaningful content or history, and the text was unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dloh  cierekim  04:53, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

August 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please dont be a drater(read last word in reverse) Suigeneris (talk) 11:19, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Egypt constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. ChiragPatnaik (talk) 12:12, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Egypt. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Rror (talk) 12:14, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:48, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Per your email request, I have unblocked this account to give you a second chance. Please contribute constructively. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:03, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jad ghassan haddad
A tag has been placed on Jad ghassan haddad, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Wikipedia is not for your resume

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. &mdash; Deontalk 11:56, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Your Unblock
I noticed you have been unblocked on the proviso you contribute constructively. Following up from the above warning for creating a page on what seems to be you, or someone you are promoting with a resume is not constructive. I have let User:Edgar181 know and it's up to him what action he thinks is necessary. &mdash; Deontalk 11:56, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

When I unblocked your account, I did so under the assumption that you wanted to contribute to Wikipedia, but it seems to me that you do not have a good understanding of what Wikipedia is. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not place for simply posting your resume or other forms of self-promotion. Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia before making any more edits. There is plenty of good reading material linked to in the welcome message above. If you are not able to contribute constructively, you will just end up being blocked from editing again. This is likely to be your last warning. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:06, 24 December 2009 (UTC)