User talk:Jae2018

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sexual assault of LGBT persons has been accepted
 Sexual assault of LGBT persons, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 06:35, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Sexual_assault_of_LGBT_persons help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

OR issues at Sexual assault of LGBT persons
Here's the concern with the "myths" section. It seems that most of your argument there is establishing that transphobia and homophobia are issues, but at a glance it appears you're making a leap to say "and that complicates addressing sexual violence in those communities."

You do not (and should not) take up a lot of space with official definitions, you can just wikilink each term in context like so: transphobia.

The larger principle here is that articles should really, really stay on topic and not diverge even to related topics. So for that section, if you're stating there are complicating factors in addressing sexual violence, you need to find sources that explicitly say "the following are complicating factors". Not just "he are some LGBT issues, and let's make a jump and assume that these issues are complicating factors". Does that make sense?

I'm also not sure about the Resources section; a Wikipedia article describes and issue, it does not advocate for an issue. There are many advocacy sites, but for Wikipedia to choose and promote them blurs the line between explanation (what an encyclopedia does) and advocacy (which it does not), not matter how noble the cause. MatthewVanitas (talk) 06:40, 7 May 2018 (UTC)