User talk:JaelaIsBack

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stella Blómkvist (August 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stella Blómkvist and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Stella_Bl%C3%B3mkvist Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Stella_Bl%C3%B3mkvist reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:03, 6 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello Robert, I'm new to Wikipedia so I'm not entirely sure what I'm supposed to do now. Do I need to move the draft into the main article space or rather delete it in order to keep the article which is up at the moment as it is? And is there a risk of the article being deleted nevertheless or will that stay on Wikipedia anyway once the duplicate draft article has been removed? JaelaIsBack (talk) 17:37, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Stella Blómkvist
Hello, JaelaIsBack,

Thank you for creating Stella Blómkvist.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Thanks! The article could really use more sources - and perhaps a project tag on the talk page?"

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:38, 12 October 2022 (UTC)


 * hey, thank you for your comment! I didn't really know what to do about the page anymore, because a Wikipedia moderator told me that it would be put up for deletion soon. His comment was as following:
 * "Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement."
 * I'm new to Wikpedia and i couldn't really figure out how to redirect a page (I did read the page dedicated to redirecting articles etc. but that didn't make me much wiser) and sadly the moderator didn't respond to my further questions on how to solve the issue, so I kind of just assumed the article would eventually be removed from Wikipedia and had pretty much abandoned to work on it more. Do you think, with this knowledge in mind, that it would make sense to continue improving the page, or would it be of no use?
 * ~ JaelaIsBack (talk) 18:04, 30 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Hiya! The draft has been redirected to the main article now that the article itself is in 'mainspace', so you can continue working on the article. As a new user, it's always safer to work on a draft, 'cos articles in mainspace are, indeed, open to things like deletion - but you're perfectly safe to work on the article for now, 'cos it's been reviewed (and so is now searchable by Google et al) but I'd suggest adding more sources that demonstrate notability - take a read of WP:GNG, which might help on working out how Wikipedia defines notability - you're basically looking for coverage from mainstream media, books or academic studies. For sure don't be deterred and feel free to work away at improving the article and adding more to it. I went ahead and added a couple of tags to the talk page (Iceland and Television project tags) - you might like to take a look around WP:WikiProject Television, which has some further information, guidelines and so on for articles about TV. You can join these project groups, BTW, if you intend to create more articles on either topic. Have fun! :) Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:17, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
 * thank you! I've done a deeper dive on Google now and found some sources which i think i can incorporate in the article. Quick question: i guess the website of the director doesn't count as an unbiased/independent source? He has some more info about the show on his website too, but it's probably not usable considering he's directly involved JaelaIsBack (talk) 13:22, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * and another question which just occured to me (i hope i'm not annoying), there where it's mentioned which platforms the show is streaming on, would it make sense to link to those streaming platforms as "proof", to an article which mentions these platforms, or is that part fine the way it is without a source? JaelaIsBack (talk) 13:28, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * No, you're NOT annoying. The director's website is fine for non-controversial information (shooting commenced on the 3rd September, the director had difficulty with the quantity of extras coated in black ink etc), it just doesn't count for WP:GNG or anything that might be better from an independent source. Ideally, a link to an article that mentions those platforms, but you could also link to the platform's 'landing page', although that's something I'd try and avoid if possible. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:45, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * thank you, I've added such sources now for the streaming platforms, so I think that's good? As for the director's website, he mentions the exact number of viewers on his page, for the claim that the show broke viewing records when it premiered, but I found that same number on another website too now, so I think I could use that one instead. Either way, I think I've pretty much covered the essentials of the article so far. It's very concise (if that's the right word? I'm not a native speaker), but it gives the info one would at minimum want to know about the show, I suppose. I could add more text and mention more info like the viewing record, awards and nominations, etc., but then I worry that I'd be making more mistakes again which would affect the quality of the article, so yeah, maybe I'll leave it at this for now. How would you say it looks, are the sources I added sufficient?
 * Thank you again for your help ~ JaelaIsBack (talk) 13:45, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi. I removed the tag, although you could have done that, too. It's been great to see the article flower! Thanks for this - it's a nice contribution to a genre that's, strangely, celebrated and at the same time overlooked! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 16:08, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * oh, I thought the person who placed it was only allowed to do that haha, well thank you anyway :) ~ JaelaIsBack (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2022 (UTC)