User talk:Jaeze

November 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=634256557 your edit] to List of poets from the United States may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:06, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edit to List of poets from the United States appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  22:18, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Greetings. Please suggest ideas or links to ideas on how to use this page. Happy New Year. Jaeze (talk) 16:44, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Talkback
&#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  00:10, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 27 August
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * On the BDSM page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=736462043 your edit] caused an empty citation error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F736462043%7CBDSM%5D%5D Ask for help])

August 2018
Hello. Your recent edit to List of barbers appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  16:58, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

The person, Seneca King, is notable. I just did not know the page had to exist on him before adding him to the list. Can you please put the information back or at least send it to me because it took a very long time for me to enter it as I was injured in an electrical trauma. Thank you ^ Jaeze (talk) 17:29, 14 August 2018 (UTC)JaezeJaeze (talk) 17:29, 14 August 2018 (UTC)


 * I have emailed both iterations. Please follow the directions in the deletion notice below to create a draft that will be reviewed to make sure there are no further problems. Hope this helps.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 19:42, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Seneca King, (entrepreneur)


A tag has been placed on Seneca King, (entrepreneur) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. John from Idegon (talk) 17:55, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Jaeze (talk)jaezeJaeze (talk) 19:27, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Regarding Speedy Deletion

Hello, Jaeze. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but a page you created, Seneca King, Barber, has been deleted as meeting one or more of the Categories for Speedy Deletion.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources which are unconnected with the subject  and which provide verifiable information. '''Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. '''

Any deficiencies should be remedied before reposting as they can lead to repeated deletions.

The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems.

If you want to try again, please use the Article Wizard or articles for creation to guide you through the creation process.

You may find this tool useful for finding sources: Google custom search

Don't feel discouraged. My first attempts at creating articles were deleted too. You can ask for help at the TEAHOUSE

There is more information at Community_portal Cheers, and happy editing. -- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 19:24, 14 August 2018 (UTC)


 * I would like to suggest that you just move such articles to the sandbox because people get very discouraged. It took me a long time to put up what I put up. whoosh...It is gone.  The comment on asking John was not helpful because it is not clear how to do that.  I read and re-read th pages you suggested before writing and again after your comment.  Those pages are absolutely unclear to someone that doesn't know what you are talking about. It is comparable to telling someone how to make a cake by telling them put the ingredients in and bake it, without telling them how much of each, what the ingredients are, what the directions mean.  For example if you already cook, "separate the eggs," is clear.  If you do not know the cooking jargon, as one person asking a couple of us for help with baking a cake.  We went to help her and surprised, we found it was a cake mix.  We asked if she read the directions.  She said. "yes."  so, we said, "Do what they say."  She proceeded to do so, and, separated the eggs.  She put one on each end of the table.  That is how clear the Wikipedia guidelines are to a lot of us.  I hope this analogy helps understand why it is frustrating to go to the pages we get referred to and read and re-read, and re-read them over and over and then get sent back to them when they are not clear when we are following the directions as they are understood.

Thanks, Jaeze (talk) 22:06, 14 August 2018 (UTC)JaezeJaeze (talk) 22:06, 14 August 2018 (UTC)