User talk:Jag123

Welcome to my talk page. To add something, please click here.

Archive 1

Enzymes etc
Hi Jag123, I like all your enzyme work. I've been doing a lot of enzymes lately, which is much outside my own field but a lot of fun. Wikipedia has quite good molecular biology, but there is still a lot of work to be done. I like the fact that we can easily link molecular biology with relevant diseases, making it a very powerful system. JFW | T@lk  15:28, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * I am not at all opposed to an enzyme box that contains all relevant info. It would go a long way in collating useful information, although we have to be careful not to try too much at the same time. JFW | T@lk  00:29, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * I'd be a bit careful with what "all relevant info" means. You don't want to get into the position of replicating a Swissprot record in the box, I wouldn't think. (example publically available Swissprot record) Courtland 00:48, 2005 Feb 14 (UTC)


 * continued @ User_talk:Ceyockey Courtland 04:07, 2005 Feb 14 (UTC)

Nuclear fusion
Hi, just to let you know I just undid your revert on the nuclear fusion article. I almost reverted it myself when I saw the change - anon edit to a number like that does set the alarm bells ringing! But in fact the edit looks to be accurate - certainly the numbers didn't add up before, and either 75,000 needed to be changed to 7,500, or 0.1MeV would have to be 1MeV. I don't know for certain but I am pretty sure 0.1MeV is right, and so 7,500 was also correct. Worldtraveller 17:19, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Deletion of useless stub templates and stub categories
Could you explain to me what you meant by the 10 day thing? Did you mean the tally on the TFD and CFD? -- AllyUnion (talk) 23:05, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Er... oops... wrong user in that respect. I changed the requirements with respect to notification.  Please see the page, and let me know if you think I can make any further improvements. -- AllyUnion (talk) 23:14, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * If that is the case, we have to decide a guideline. Not to interrupt stub sorting in any manner, but I believe that the guidelines need to be set down before we continue.  Let us face it, the English Wikipedia is nearly at 500k articles.  Without clear guidelines for our sorting project, we will have far more problems when the English Wikipedia goes beyond that 500k level. -- AllyUnion (talk) 23:06, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Geo-stubs
Hi Jag123, No offense intended, but it's going to slow down the stub sorting if I have to go and correct a lot of the stubs you do! Please remember that geo-stubs are now largely divided by country. I'm not expecting anyone to learn all the new templates, but a few of the common ones, like UK-geo-stub, might be useful :) Grutness|hello?  00:51, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * ...I just went through a long list of stubs and anything that was a geographical location (amongst many other things) was moved to their general category. If you're familiar with all of the geographical stubs, you don't have to go through the google search, I've just given you a bunch that you can properly sort once and for all. Having every one going through the generic stubs list and/or the google search and just picking articles that suit them isn't any faster for the project... Having that said, since you've seemed to have worked with a lot of geo stubs, tell me what templates I'm most likely to encounter and I'll be sure to specify it.

True, and sorry if I sounded annoyed. You are doing good work with the stub sorting. Having said that, there are people going through the list looking for geography stubs, which is why there are very few of them in certain parts of the alphabet in the big stub list. The ones you'd be most likely to find are probably UK-geo-stub, US-geo-stub, and Canada-geo-stub. A lot of larger countries, like Canada, use "countryname-geo-stub", so that is worth trying with a preview. But any help is appreciated (even though I can seem grumpy at times!) Grutness|hello? 01:25, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Just found your note about the Falkland stubs (putting them in UK-geo-stub) - problem with getting two new messages, you only notice the last one! As you probably know, I've added a britOT-geo-stub since them, since the Faalklands and similar places were just about all that was left uncategorised. Grutness|hello? [[Image:Grutness.jpg|25px|]] 23:30, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Stub sorting guidelines
I sincerely believe that we really need to lay down the law in stub sorting, and really provide a guideline. I believe that we should all attempt to reach a general consensus by April 2, 2005 in a set of rules that we can follow. Once we have built a set of guidelines, we can formally create a policy out of those guidelines. We need to define what a specialized topic stub is, how many articles it should cover, when is it appropriate to create it, what defines its need for its creation, what defines its need for deletion, what criteria it should follow, what are the general steps should one take when sorting a stub, whether or not to start using subst: for all templates, whether or not use subst: for all templates created by the meta-templates, and any other matters that may come up in consideration. I thank jag123 for initially creating the subpage for the project at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Stub sorting/Guidelines. Even though they have been discussed, I feel that we really need to confirm everything. For that, we should discuss each issue with its own sections, and raise a list of issues that we need to nail down before really continuing on. The English Wikipedia is nearly at 500k articles. Either the MediaWiki software needs to handle stubs such that they can be found with a simple union of categories, or the sorting is done manually by Wikipedians. Personally, I think the latter is less taxing on the server load, especially when we use subst:, which I think would help the Wikipedia out, performance wise. Please make your comments at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Stub sorting/Guidelines. I apologize for making this somewhat of a spam notice, but since the project has more members, the project can finally decide on these important issues at hand. -- AllyUnion (talk) 23:24, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

NP-easy
Hi Jag123,

yesterday I changed the article about NP-easy problems. In particular, I changed the example of an NP-easy problem from sorting to co-3-SAT. Sorting can be done in polynomial time, thus it is of course an example for an NP-easy problem, but it is in no sense a helpful example since the NP-oracle is not necessary for it. I think co-3-SAT is a better example since it shows that the class of NP-easy problems contains also all problems from co-NP. Is there a reason for changing the example back to sorting?

Taiwan and Republic of China
There is also Category:Republic of China, and that's where the Category:Taiwan-related stubs should be stick to. The current government in Taipei bears the official title of "Republic of China", but not the one in Beijing. — Instantnood 18:49, Feb 19 2005 (UTC)

China-geo-stubs
There are currently 201 articles in the category of China geography stubs.

Two involves both mainland China and the ROC
 * Taiwan Strait,
 * Cathay,

16 are related to the ROC only
 * Chiayi,
 * Chungli City,
 * Cishan, Kaohsiung,
 * Douliou City,
 * Fongyuan,
 * Fort Zeelandia (Taiwan),
 * Guanmiao, Tainan,
 * Guantian, Tainan,
 * Jhubei City,
 * Jhudong, Hsinchu,
 * Kenting National Park,
 * Tsoying,
 * Wufong, Taichung,
 * Xiaonanmen Branch,
 * Yongkang City,
 * Yunlin County,

and 183 are related to mainland China only. (No article is related to Hong Kong or Macao.)

I don't think readers would recognise Category:China geography stubs covers geostubs related to the ROC, until they read the notice on the of the category, or see category's link at an ROC-related article. &mdash; Instantnood 18:53, Feb 19 2005 (UTC)
 * The current settings make Template:China-geo-stub fails to fulfill its function to include ROC-related geostubs. Most ROC-related geostubs are inserted the tag instead of  (see Category:Taiwan-related stubs), an obvious evidence that editors do hestitate to put on such a template.  &mdash; Instantnood 15:51 Feb 20 2005 (UTC)

Meta Templates harmful
Re: your various posts negative side effects of meta templates, I was wondering if converting the many stub templates to no longer use metastub or metapicstub templates, but have something <div class="boilerplate".... would help things. Will changing a stub template that is used by several hundred (or thousands) articles, cause a DoS-type attack, like you describe in Meta-templates considered harmful? Is this something that's worth doing or not really? --jag123 20:51, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * Converting this is probably a good idea, and has been discussed on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Stub sorting. I would think that as long as you make the subst: conversion at an off-peak time (say 00:00-06:00 UTC), the impact might be minimal. -- Netoholic @ 21:11, 2005 Feb 21 (UTC)

I think I made you misunderstand. I meant to use subst on the template. Edit "Template:Foo-stub" and replace with ... . -- Netoholic @ 04:38, 2005 Feb 23 (UTC)

Thanks.:) Best time to do it is best found by looking at the squid graphs. Of course, that does need to be a time when you're actually available.:) The lower the traffic, the less disrupton there is because the database servers will have more unused disk seeks available to process the updates. I tend not to notice updates affecting a few hundred articles, so those you can probably do whenever is convenient for you at any rate which works for you (well, with a few seconds between them). Ideally not at the busiest 6 hours or so though. Once it gets to 1,000 or more it's good to wait a few minutes between each update to keep the potential frustration level for other people down. At 5,000 or more it's very useful to take care to leave gaps and do it off peak. Don't be unduly concerned about disruption - short term sacrifices for ongoing improvement are worth doing even if they do inconvenience people while they are happening. Jamesday 01:23, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

James Monroe University
Jag123, it concerns me that some individuals can post erroneous opinions using words like "some critics" etc. and get away with it. But when Alumni post information to rectify the statements then we get warnings and our amendments erased. Not exactly a fair go is it!

The fact is that this African University and other Liberian Universities are trying to rectify the misinformation being spread around. How can they do that if it keeps being erased on the Wikipedia and affiliated boards? There are some individuals with hidden agendas posting on these boards trying to deliberately derail these institutions.

As far as I see that should not be allowed in a fair forum.

Thanks for allowing me to post this in reponse.

OK
I changed the info and it was erased ...is that not vandalism? I point to factual info and it gets erased. I try to edit it and it gets erased ....

Yo
Can we add porn to wikipedia? --Pleaseoso der Tarafare 09:33, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Converting Template:LGBT-stub
Thanks for converting the new stub and giving me links to the information about why it should be converted. It was my first template (and darn was I proud of it), and I simply used another stub template as my startoff point. Well, now I know better and can make these stubs even better in the future. Best regards. Sfdan 08:37, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Canada stub Templates
See the talk page of your little controversial project. --Spinboy 19:44, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)

One Life to Live
Hi, I realize that the policy regarding who should be listed under cast is still ongoing but Shanelle Workman has confirmed in numerous sources that she has started taping The Bold and the Beautiful so this isn't exactly a rumor.

User:Dowew

Requests for comment/67.86.174.158
I've started an RFC about the anonymous user who has been adding anti-semitic remarks to Pontius Pilate. Since you attempted to resolve the dispute, I'd appreciate if you'd certify the RFC. It's available at Requests for comment/67.86.174.158. Thanks. Rhobite 03:14, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)

Transwiki bot
Hey, somehow I missed your entry on my talk page from the 14th about you wanting me to transwiki the bits that were in a separate category like Category: Ready to Move to Wiktionary instead of the entries in Category:Copy to Wiktionary. If you would create a category like that and let me know where it is, and then change the template accordingly on the articles that you've formatted, I'd be happy to transwiki them once you've formatted them.

Also, were you asking me to not transwiki the articles from Category:Copy to Wiktionary? Personally, I think it's be more useful for you to format them over on Wiktionary after they've been transwikied rather than formatting them before they get moved - but whatever you want to do is fine with me. Kevin Rector 21:05, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)

Peer review
Hey, Jag123, at least from my horizon, we seem to have unconsciously been collaborating quite smoothly at creating a new Sesame Street peer review page and moving the listing to the right place! At least, for my part, I didn't even get an edit conflict, I hope you didn't either. It took me a little while to make the subpage, since there was an old request page in the way, so I suppose we were quite lucky it worked so well. 2 minutes apart in the history, congratulations to us both! :-) --Bischånen|Tåk 19:41, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Public domain image problems
Hi there! I noticed that you have placed some of your image contributions in the public domain. Unfortunately, it turns out that one can't place their work in the public domain, and so these image tags have been deprecated. I encourage you to replace the public domain tags on your images with free-use tags, which are similar in spirit, such as CopyrightedFreeUse-User. Please reply on my talk page or Wikipedia talk: You can't grant your work into the public domain if you have any questions. Thanks. Deco 23:43, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Why the deletion?
Why did You delete the material on the use of osteons in ageing, sexing, etc.?

Osteon history note is not incorrect
I don't know why you think it appears incorrect. For references, see, e.g., D. Ruscillo (ed.) Ageing and Sexing in Zooarchaeology. Oxbow Press. Okeh, the formatting is wrong, but I can't help that: I have written before that Wik is hard to understand - I followed the directions - sometimes the formatting is ofkeh, sometimes it isn't - I don't know why.

Help!
Hi, Jag.

You offered to help. My first question is how do I use the help page. When I open up to the dialogue page, I cannot type in the heading or body spaces - How do I activate them.

Another question: When I enter text in for a new article, sometimes it appears messed up, and sometimes it appears the way I typed it. What are the secrets of formatting? Wik is so complicated and convoluted that I have a hard time finding the simplest instructions (and can't remember where they are unless I happen to go back there within a few days). One specific change I'd like to see (and please don't ask me to make it, since I don't know how) is to have a separate listing for adding articles rather than hiding that information (which is unclear enough) under "editing." (Sorry if this is a repeat.) 211.225.32.225 07:56, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Whoops
So, why isn't my login giving my username (kdammers) rather than the i.p. number? The text I just wrote is an example of what sometimes (but not always) happens to my texts. 211.225.32.225 07:59, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Stem cells
Could you just take a look on the discussion page on Pluripotential hemopoietic stem cell. Believe some word are incorrect.

Regarding 'Pluripotential Hemopoietic Stem Cell'.
The definitions of the CFUs contradict the definitions in my histology textbook. Check out the talk page for details.

lots of edits, not an admin
Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. If you're at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in this list? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list, although there is certainly no guarantee anyone will ever look at it. Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) 22:57, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

Featured Diagrams
There is a discussion going on at Featured picture candidates because I brought up the idea that maybe we should create a "Featured Diagram" listing similar to the Featured Pictures listing. I have long been of the mind that diagrams/charts aren't really in the same category as featured pictures, so I made the suggestion that there be a new index of charts/diagrams (possibly titled Featured Diagrams) for that type of image. I was just wondering if you had any thoughts on this? We're discussing this on the Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates page, so if you have any comments, please let us know. --ScottyBoy900Q 22:20, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

Email?
Hi Jag, my German account doesn't work on this site, so I cannot use your email form. I would like to print one of your pictures in a magazine and kindly request you to contact me. Yours, Lumi 84.190.209.198 16:02, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Pseudo-category on your .js page
Your monobook.js page includes the string "[ [Category:" (without the embedded space), which confuses the WP software and induces that page's inclusion in a bogus category. You might want to modify the program to read, instead, "[" + "[Category:". Matchups 04:11, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Cytochrome P450 oxidase page
The image of a structural model is labeled incorrectly. It is labeled as CYP 2E1 but it is really CYP 2C9. There hasn't been a published 2E1 model yet.

HMG-CoA fix
Thanks for your great images on cholesterol synthesis. Recently on Talk:HMG-CoA reductase pathway an anonymous user noted a small error in HMG-CoA's structure in Image:Cholesterol-Synthesis-Reaction1.png (which was extracted from Image:Cholesterol-Synthesis-Complete.png, so it needs fixing too). Basically, carbon six needs to be replaced with a hydroxyl group. If you could take a look at this, it'd be much appreciated. Best, David Iberri (talk) 14:56, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Myoglobin.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Myoglobin.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 10:30, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

French for the mentally challenged
It's no joke. Check out this Montréal website, and in particular, take a look at the "Ortograf altêrnatif". The Jade Knight 00:11, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:Aconitine.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Aconitine.png, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 09:49, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Image: Luciferase from the firefly
Hi Jag, this is Luziferase from the german Wikipedia. I like to complete the german article about the luciferase. For this I need a nice picture from the protein. Now my question: Can Iuse your picture in this article? I won't modify it or copy it for other things! I only want to present it in the german version of luciferase. Please answer me on the following page: |User talk of Luziferase. Thank you for aour time, Luziferase

Film-stub
Hi there Jag! I followed a "what links here" link to your User:Jag123/Template:WL-Stubs page. If that's for your own reference, would you mind changing movie-stub to film-stub, which is the template currently in use? Thanks - Her Pegship  (tis herself) 05:15, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Request for comments
There is a request for comments on the Robert Latimer page; please see Talk:Robert Latimer. Rosemary Amey 23:26, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Sphingosine-Synthesis.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sphingosine-Synthesis.png, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Roadnottaken 16:42, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Diels-alder.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Diels-alder.png, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  16:44, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Snowfall (Snowfall Trilogy)
A tag has been placed on Snowfall (Snowfall Trilogy) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 08:49, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

NowCommons: Image:Carnitine-Structure.png
Image:Carnitine-Structure.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Carnitine structure.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all MediaWiki wiki's. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 18:43, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Paralyzed (song)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Paralyzed (song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * non-notable song

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Rwiggum (Talk /Contrib ) 16:56, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

File:AngiotensinCE-1O8A.png
What is the source of, and why is the above linked image public domain?--Rockfang (talk) 01:20, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:AngiotensinCE-1O8A.png
Thanks for uploading File:AngiotensinCE-1O8A.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:57, 20 June 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 01:57, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Acrosin-1FIW.png
File:Acrosin-1FIW.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Acrosin-1FIW.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 22:15, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:AlphaHelix.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:AlphaHelix.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:01, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:01, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:LinoleicAcid-Structural.png
Thank you for uploading File:LinoleicAcid-Structural.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:03, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:03, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:LinolenicAcid-Structural.png
Thank you for uploading File:LinolenicAcid-Structural.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:05, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:05, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:OleicAcid-Structural.png
Thank you for uploading File:OleicAcid-Structural.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:05, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:05, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Could you help me?
It used to be that when I typed in a topic that did not have an article, I got a prompt asking if I wanted to suggest the article. I don't get that any-more, and can't find where to suggest an article be written on, e.g., author Rachel Shukert. Do you know where and if it is still possible to make suggestions? Kdammers (talk) 06:16, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Chem-Mech-AcylChlorideAcylium.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chem-Mech-AcylChlorideAcylium.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Leyo 12:51, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

File:FattyAcid-MB-Hydration.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FattyAcid-MB-Hydration.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Leyo 12:53, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

File:FattyAcid-MB-OxidationByFAD.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FattyAcid-MB-OxidationByFAD.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Leyo 12:53, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

File:OChem-Mech-CarbocationFormation.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:OChem-Mech-CarbocationFormation.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Leyo 12:54, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

File:OChem-Reaction-FCAcylation-Chloride.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:OChem-Reaction-FCAcylation-Chloride.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Leyo 12:54, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

File:OChem-Reaction-FCAlkylation.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:OChem-Reaction-FCAlkylation.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Leyo 12:54, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

File:PentosePhosphatePathway-OxidativeNADPH.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PentosePhosphatePathway-OxidativeNADPH.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Leyo 12:56, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Compound images
Category:Compound images, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Leyo 18:12, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Reaction images
Category:Reaction images, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Leyo 18:17, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:FattyAcid-Activation.png
Thank you for uploading File:FattyAcid-Activation.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:48, 2 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 05:48, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Phosphatidate.png
Thank you for uploading File:Phosphatidate.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:34, 2 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 19:34, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Phosphatidyl-Choline.png
Thank you for uploading File:Phosphatidyl-Choline.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:35, 2 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 19:35, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Sphingosine.png
Thank you for uploading File:Sphingosine.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:53, 2 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 19:53, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Grammars


The article Grammars has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable journal. Homepage is dead link. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 18:25, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Other events of 2004 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Other events of 2004. Since you had some involvement with the Other events of 2004 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 03:22, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Other events of 2003 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Other events of 2003. Since you had some involvement with the Other events of 2003 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 03:23, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Other Chilean Regions listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Other Chilean Regions. Since you had some involvement with the Other Chilean Regions redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 00:59, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

North Koreans listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect North Koreans. Since you had some involvement with the North Koreans redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 04:05, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

HRH The Duke of York listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect HRH The Duke of York. Since you had some involvement with the HRH The Duke of York redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nev&eacute;–selbert 19:43, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Development Education Society


A tag has been placed on Development Education Society requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  Dr Strauss   talk   20:32, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Computerized
Hello, Jag123. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Computerized, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit edit the page]
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

-- Aunva6talk - contribs 05:52, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Darwin's listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Darwin&. Since you had some involvement with the Darwin's redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question)  20:57, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Shoguns (esports)
Hello, Jag123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shoguns (esports), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:05, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Shoguns (esports)


Hello, Jag123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shoguns".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:33, 10 January 2023 (UTC)