User talk:Jag64551

Re: Your AfC (Jean Mansel)
Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia&. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. --ANowlin: talk 18:28, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia& was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! --ANowlin: talk 20:21, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jean Mansel concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jean Mansel, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 11:42, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Jean Mansel


Hello Jag64551. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Jean Mansel.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 13:30, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

http://www.pwnrank.com
Hello jag64551. I undone 2 of your edits, and I saw that you added this as a source. I have to tell you that the site is not notable. It also is probably not reliable at all, and would not meet WP:RS NathanWubs (talk) 14:30, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Can you please provide feedback on what about this was not reliable. Are there guidelines that define when a site is reliable? The site uses very reliable sources when computing the final rankings. Thank you. jag64551
 * please check WP:VG/RS and WP:RS to see what makes a site reliable. Making up opinion numbers just based on some reliable sources is not automatically reliable. Also even if it did meet reliability. The other problem still is that the site is not notable at all. A lot of none-notable sites use reliable information, but because they are not notable we do not include them. If we did the review list for at least the popular games would be several pages long. NathanWubs (talk) 18:11, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
 * When the site is "notable", I will re-add the information. At that time, I hope whomever is moderating takes the time to see how it actually works. Thank you.jag64551