User talk:JagSeal

= Discussions =

Image:Lcs1.jpg
I've changed the tagging of this image from being in the PD as a work of the USN to Non-free fair use in. The image is not one taken by USN personnel, but one taken by Lockheed. The USN has permission to use it, not rights to it. As such, the image is property of Lockheed Martin and they retain rights to the image. --Durin 19:05, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * And as expected, OrphanBot has now tagged it as not having a fair use rationale. One needs to be provided on the image or it will be deleted. --Durin 19:12, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I am currently checking with Lockheed as to their fair use requirements for the image. I would assume that they will have no problem with the use of the image.--JagSeal 20:41, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism
I believe we have a content dispute and not vandalism. Gillinghamr 18:25, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Wyominghs.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Wyominghs.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jusjih 03:18, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * When you uploaded the image initially in April, 2006, you said, "Image was created by a public school and therefore is open for use." This is a false statement.  HOWEVER, based on your statement on my talk page that you, personally, are the actual photographer, I have restored the image temporarily.  In order for the image to stay, we need to have appropriate documentation in the OTRS system demonstrating that it is not a copyright violation.  To provide this documentation, please send an email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org giving (1) your name, (2) a statement that you are the photographer and the copyright holder (keep in mind that if you photographed it as a part of your duties as an employee of the school, the copyright belongs to your employer as a "work product"), and (3) a statement that you release the photograph into the public domain.  For more information, please see WP:COPYREQ.  Thank you. --B (talk) 22:12, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Lcs1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lcs1.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 13:54, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:


 * 1) Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
 * 2) Editor-focused central editing dashboard
 * 3) "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
 * 4) Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
 * 5) Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded User wikipedia/RC Patrol (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)