User talk:Jagcataldo/sandbox

Jilly's Peer Review
Peer review

General info Whose work are you reviewing? Jagcataldo Link to draft you're reviewing: Jagcataldo/Chad-China relations

Lead

Guiding questions:

Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?

−Not yet. The lead is similar to the one in the original article.

Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?

−Yes, it is about Chad-China relations.

Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?

−No, just offers an introduction to a brief timeline of Chad-China relations.

Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?

−No.

Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

−No.

Lead evaluation

It provides a quick introduction to Chad-China relations. It would be nice to include descriptions about major sections that will be covered later in the article.

Content

Guiding questions:

Is the content added relevant to the topic?

−Yes.

Is the content added up-to-date?

−The content seems up-to-date, but many sources are not as current (most are from earlier than 2012).

Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

−The content is definitely very interesting. I think it would be nice if there could be more included on how Chad-China relations began, what they entailed, how they were disrupted by Chad's recognition of Taiwan, and where they stand today. There seems to be more information on US-Chad relations in the History of Chad-China relations section than on the latter.

Content evaluation

The content is interesting and related to the topic, but it would be good to learn more about Chad-China relations, specifically, in the history section and what relations were like during 1972-1997.

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

Is the content added neutral?

−Yes.

Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

−No, although, it would be nice to read more on how China has benefited from the relationship.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

−There is a little bit more information on US-China relations than on Chad-China relations.

Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

−No.

Tone and balance evaluation

Overall, the article is relatively balanced in representing relations between Chad and China, but I think it would be good to read more about China's perspective.

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?

−Yes, although, I recommend using academic journals or peer-reviewed articles as a majority of your sources.

Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?

−I recommend including academic journals or peer-reviewed articles as they are more credible sources than newspaper articles and may have more in-depth analysis/perspective that could be useful for the article.

Are the sources current?

−Most sources are from earlier than 2012.

Check a few links. Do they work?

−Yes.

Sources and references evaluation

Sources are definitely relevant to the topic, but I think it would be good to include more credible or academic sources to add more perspective.

Organization

Guiding questions:

Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?

−Yes, it is concise and easy to read.

Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?

−No.

Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

−Yes.

Organization evaluation

Content is well-organized and explains the timeline of Chad-China relations well, especially in terms of China's development finance investments.

Images and Media

Images and media have not been included in the article yet.

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?

−Yes, there is substantially more information on Chad-China relations than in the original article.

What are the strengths of the content added?

−There is more information on the implementation of specific development projects and the timeline of relations.

How can the content added be improved?

−It would be interesting to read more about how China benefits from the relationship, any international controversies that have arisen from the relationship, and how both countries were able to overcome the Taiwan controversy.

Overall evaluation

Good start to the article! The content is engaging and relevant to current affairs.

Jillychoi (talk) 01:48, 6 April 2020 (UTC)