User talk:Jagd71

Welcome!
Hello, Jagd71, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. JarrahTree 09:59, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Please
Get a handle on WP:OR and WP:V and WP:RS - thanks JarrahTree 10:00, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Your edits at Boomer Island (Tasmania)
I am almost certain that you have a direct financial WP:COI with this topic of this article.

It appears you are attempting to remove information which affects the reputation of a asset which you hold a financial interest. You appear to be trying to justify the removal of this information by making false and disingenuous claims that there is a risk to public safety.
 * 1) There are no cliffs surrounding the island. It is perfectly safe to walk around.
 * 2) The public would be entitled to walk along the entire perimeter of this tied island, if they wished to.
 * 3) If there was a public safety issue at stake here (which there is not), then matter would require intervention from Crown Land Services - it would not require wikipedia editors to perform censorship of the topic.
 * 4) If (the owner) has had problems with security, then it is up to the owner to figure our why this is occurring, and it is the owner's problem to manage. It is not grounds to sensor facts from wikipedia audiences.

You do not appear to have used any reference since you started editing on Wikipedia (under the user Jagd71 or the IP address 58.179.135.91). You almost certainly have a major COI with this topic, which you have failed to properly disclose and properly manage

Vitreology  talk  17:34, 20 December 2019 (UTC)