User talk:Jagdfeld

Improve:"I strive very hard for total accuracy, but if I make a mistake, please revert (if you wish), and drop me a message here so I know you consider it a mistake and can improve my edits. Thank you."Jagdfeld 14:45, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XIX - December 2007
The December 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot -- 11:30, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Leslie Halliwell
I made a report at Administrator Intervention against Vandalism earlier this week about that IP editor's edits to Diggers Rest, Victoria which is where I have run into their handiwork. A block was refused as "it wasn't blatant enough". That is probably right but the false accusations of vandalism made about yourself are out of order. Best to just keep reverting and if it gets too heavy (i.e. a couple of times a day), make another report to AIV. I now have the article on my watchlist so I can keep an eye on it (and them). Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk 12:59, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XX - January 2008
The January 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot -- 13:35, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

WP:EL
Hi,

You added a link to Fruit, which I've removed. My rational is that WP:EL says links should be those that are beyond what the page could contain were it to become a featured article. Given the link that you placed in was a very long one, but still a link to another encyclopedia (one that may be publically editable as well, I'm not sure), I don't see it as appropriate as an EL, and perhaps tenuously so as a reliable source for an inline citation. What do you think? Was I trigger happy? Do you think there's merit to linking to another encyclopedia page? Thought I'd ask in case you had a better rational to add than I had to remove.

Thanks, WLU (talk) 16:53, 31 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Sure, that works. I still think it's better as an in-line citation, but it's a lot of work to integrate all the information into the wikipage itself.  Replace if you think warranted then.  WLU (talk) 17:51, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Google logo
An article that you have been involved in editing, Google logo, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Google logo. Thank you. LightSpeed3 (talk) 17:23, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXII - March 2008
The March 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot --16:49, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Novels - 1st Coordinators Election
An election has been proposed and has been set up for this project. Description of the roles etc., can be found at WikiProject Novels/Coordinators. If you wish to stand, enter your candidacy before the end of March and ask your questions of anyone already standing at WikiProject Novels/Coordinators/May 2008. Voting will start on the 1st April and close at the end of April. The intention is for the appointments to last from May - November 2008. For other details check out the pages or ask. KevinalewisBot (talk) 12:57, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Deaths in 2008
An editor has nominated Deaths in 2008, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:01, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Apologies
Apologies for that rollback, Huggle was messing up. -- Blake  01  09:40, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Your edit on population
Please see the talk page and explain your recent edit on the Genocides in History article on population numbers. Why did you make claims not in the sources? []Ebanony (talk) 06:27, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

War of 1812
Hello, Your use of a fiction source for the War of 1812 is not appropriate and I have removed it. If you want to state why you believe it should be included then go to the talk page and explain why. Please do not continue to put it in without a consensus of editors. Dwalrus (talk) 16:37, 22 November 2010 (UTC)


 * I've removed your edit as it does not meet the reliable source standard for Wikipedia articles. While I happen to agree that the America lost that war you have to have a better source than that.  I think what you are trying to get at is that some Americans and some American historians think that the U.S. lost the war and you would be right, but get 5 or 6 mainstream historians that say that and we can support a sentence or two on that.Tirronan (talk) 20:32, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Hijacking identity
User:Kansas Bear asked me to take a look at the genocide page. Jagdfeld, would you please consider checking that your password has not been seen by someone else, if you're not sure that all the edits to the genocide article under your username have been made by you? The software usually works pretty well. Ask me or, better still, User:Kirill Lokshin, for help if you need it. Buckshot06 (talk) 17:58, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)