User talk:Jagello

Hi, the article Korean name is undergoing a Featured Article Review right now. As far as I can tell, it's the only Korea-related Featured Article, and I doubt it can survive the way it is now. I noticed you worked on this article before, so I hope you can help now, and maybe continue on to make one or two more Korea-related Featured Articles eventually. Maybe you can contact others who may be interested, since it's not getting much attention right now. Thanks. Chuniac (talk) 18:29, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Hyung
'Hyung' (older brother) is a Goguryeo orignated word correct? Kuebie (talk) 22:20, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Kuebie (talk) 00:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Regarding Goguryeo language
Hi there, I noticed that you've made posts about the article on Goguryeo language a few times recently. I thought that I'd offer my assistance in improving the article since you apparently haven't been getting much help; I hold a degree in general linguistics after all, so I can probably help dig through some literature on the subject (though fair warning; I'd probably only be capable of comprehending linguistics literature written in English). &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 00:36, 16 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi. Moved the table to Buyeo languages. I wonder about some of them, though. Middle Korean genitive nʲ: How would that have even been written? Also the ɐ's seemed odd, or at least I've never seen them, so I assumed they were ʌ or ə. Correct me if I'm wrong.
 * Also, the iso code for Silla, oko, is also the code for Old Korean. That's why I had both names in the table. — kwami (talk) 14:32, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Wiman
Hi Jagello, I've recently created a move request for Wei Man and was hoping if you'd take a look and comment on it. Kuebie (talk) 22:16, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Jeju dialect
Please consider what the article says before deleting. In your edit summary, you say, "The language Infobox contains orginal research: categorizing Jeju to altaic language familly. And Koreanic languages as a language familly is against the majority view." However, the infobox does not categorize Jeju as Altaic (any more than the Korean article does), and it does not claim that it's Koreanic, it claims that it's Korean. Since you agree that Jeju dialect is Korean, you agree with the infobox, so you would appear to have no basis for deletion. Your claim of OR seems to be spurious. — kwami (talk) 00:28, 20 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Answered on my talk page. The table is correct for Jeju being a dialect of Korean, and matches your POV re. Jeju. — kwami (talk) 00:26, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Compare the dialects of Chinese, or German, or anything else: the dialects of Yue, say, are given the same color as Chinese as a whole, and their superior node in the classification is Yue. Korean is a normal human language, and should be treated the same as other human languages: dialects of Korean share the family/sprachbund color of Korean, and Korean (or in some cases Central or NW Korean) is the superior node. If I had fam1=Altaic it would be a different matter, as that has not been established to everyone's satisfaction, but no-one disputes that Jeju is a variety of Korean. If green is not an acceptable color for Jeju, it is not an acceptable color for Korean either, yet green is what we have. The code in the box is 'Altaic', but nothing in the box tells the reader that: green can be taken as a sprachbund, the same as Caucasian, Papuan, Australian, and American are. — kwami (talk) 00:29, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Silla / Old Korean
What is the difference between Silla and Old Korean that you are proposing?

According to the ISO codes, oko is both Old Korean and Silla.

Is Silla considered a dialect of Old Korean? If so, we should removed the ISO code from that article. Is Old Korean a language family that includes Silla? If so, we should remove the ISO code from that article. Are they different historical stages of the same language? If so, we should make that clear. Are they different names for the same language, as the ISO code states? If so, the articles should be merged. Or, do we perhaps not know whether Sillan and Old Korean were the same thing? — kwami (talk) 03:32, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Since both Ethnologue and Linguist List say that Sillan is an alt name for OK, I left the code in the box but made it clear that it was for OK, and clarified further in the text. Also noted that OK may have been a language family rather than a single language, since Sillan, Koguryo, and Paekche are generally presented as languages. — kwami (talk) 03:52, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12
Hi. When you recently edited Buyeo kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nongan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Which other accounts have you used? Or which external source told you about that article?
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 11:42, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Balhae
Since you've edited the article on Balhae, email me for source on the culture and language of Balhae.Americkk (talk) 16:30, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Spacecowboy420 (talk) 10:44, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Kindly stop mentioning my name on pages I can't edit
Please?

I won't report you on ANI again if you stop it.

Best,

Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 21:20, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

February 2019
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Balhae does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! —DIYeditor (talk) 20:45, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

One or two Baekje languages
Hi Jagello,

I lifted your comments from 12 years ago on the talk page of Japanese-Koguryoic languages and pasted them in Baekje language (with a little rewording). Would you mind checking what I said, and do you have the references for what you said? I'm sure that sooner or later it will be tagged as unreferenced otherwise. If there is that little evidence for Han-Baekje (at least, I assume it's Han-Baekje that's the unsupported language, since you don't say which), then that's definitely something to note in the article.

Thanks, — kwami (talk) 07:01, 6 April 2019 (UTC)