User talk:Jageracog2020

Welcome!
Hello, Jageracog2020, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 22:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:28, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 11:01, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 11:05, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Tantamount to election shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 11:11, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi Jageracog2020! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 11:12, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Doug Weller talk 15:42, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

If you can show that you understand and can follow our policies and guidelines, and why you've been reverted so often, an appeal might be granted. Doug Weller talk 15:44, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Unblocking
Unblocking |= I was blocked because of my edits on the page Tantamount to election I removed a part referencing the southern strategy (as if it were fact) because this is meant to be a book of facts not opinions but people kept changing to back to the way it was on one of the pages it states the southern strategy as fact which it is not and people kept changing it and I changed it back I think this may be a case of political bias. I was blocked for removing someone's opinion on a page of fact that does not seem fair. I was told that I need to provide a link the page in question so here it is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tantamount_to_election