User talk:Jageshwar

Mr Jagesshwar You do bad things just to damage iimsam, please stop changing the facts about IIMSAM.

Mr. Homoudy113, Please check your talk page and refer to the facts and their source. What you are involved in can be termed as cyber arson and involvement in baseless allegation. For instance corroborate your facts from http://www.un.org/News/briefings/docs/2010/db101221.doc.htm or the comprehensive Fox News Report or the UN Treaty Department etc. I ask you to refrain immediately. Thanks

Mr. Homoudy113, I hope you are aware that you are putting an information which can be termed as blatant lie. For example, on what basis are you calling Remigio Maradona the Secretary General of IIMSAM. Why would any respected organisation appoint a Secretary General against whom larceny and fraud are alleged ? It has to be person of extraordinary talent especially if the person is not from a country that is a Member State of IIMSAM. Please do not be judgmental about facts and take them as they are. What if someone says that that the so-called ombudsman of IIMSAM does not have a university degree ? I would ask you to check the facts.

Dear Mr Homoudy113, Since you use wikipedia, I hope you can read and understand English. You must be aware of the background of Maradona with WAFUNIF where larceny and fraud was alleged against him. Please check the UN archives. You are also aware of the fact there are no official records that show when, where and by whom he was appointed the Secretary General of IIMSAM and as per the procedure mentioned in the Constituting Treaty of CISRI / IIMSAM. The first time Remigio Maradon is referred to as the Secretary General of IIMSAM is on an official press release dated 27 September 2010. Please check the IIMSAM website. On 21st December 2010, the spokesperson of the United Nations Secretary General Mr. Farhan Haq categorically made clear that no person has been able to confirm that they are the authorized representatives of the organization. Please access- www.un.org/News/briefings/docs/2010/db101221.doc.htm It also infers that the UN does not recognise his claim as the Secretary General of IIMSAM and he can not enter the United Nations as no pass is issued to him. Do you have any records that show that IIMSAM participated in UN ECOSOC in 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012. It mean that the UN does not agree with the delusions of Remigio Maradona to call himself as the Secretary General. . After clarification of the UN in December 2010, and the report of Fox News in January 2011, Remigio Maradona has graced Dubai, UAE since February 2011. Please contact the former staff or ex-goodwill ambassadors who resigned en-mass in 2012. Why are you contorting facts is anybody's guess but very obvious.

July 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Rambo's Revenge (talk)  10:40, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Rambo's Revenge (talk)  10:58, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dabomb87 (talk) 14:00, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * IIMSAM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link to Spirulina


 * World Food Conference (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link to Spirulina

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:IIMSAM Conference Amman, Jordan.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:IIMSAM Conference Amman, Jordan.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:05, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:IIMSAM's Spirulina Nutritional Initiatives, Mexico, 2011.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:IIMSAM's Spirulina Nutritional Initiatives, Mexico, 2011.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:25, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:IIMSAM in --Mexico--, 2011.jpeg


A tag has been placed on File:IIMSAM in --Mexico--, 2011.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 08:33, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

IIMSAM
Hi, I have removed incorrect bold formatting of copy in the IIMSAM article on several occasions referring to the MOS:BOLD guideline yet you keep adding or re-adding bold text to the article. Please stop doing that as it is a clear violation of the MOS:BOLD guideline. Furthermore your application of bold text appears distinctly non-neutral and seems intended to emphasize certain negative aspects of individuals or organizations. Please ensure that your edits conform to the "Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)" and "Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)" policies. --Wolbo (talk) 11:17, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, this is to inform you that I have again removed incorrect bolding of text in the article per MOS:BOLD that you re-applied after my previous notification above. I do not know why you keep re-adding bold text, you did not reply to my previous notification, but please stop doing so as these edits are not constructive. --Wolbo (talk) 10:43, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, I notice that you keep re-adding the bold text (diff, diff, diff) despite being informed repeatedly that this is against the MOS:BOLD guideline. I'm not sure what it is you're trying to achieve, also because you have not responded in any way to previous notifications, but clearly these edits have now become disruptive. If you continue with this conduct without engaging in dialogue or providing justification for these edits I will take this issue to WP:ANI.--Wolbo (talk) 16:16, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Please note that I reverted your additions of paragraphs containing copy on Mr. Maradona of IIMSAM to articles were they are irrelevant and, as others have pointed out, constituted soapboxing (1, 2, 3, 4). These additions were identical to one you added to the Monica Seles article and which was reverted earlier (5). These edits as well as the bolding edits are NPOV. Please note that Wikipedia is not a platform for soapboxing or settling personal grudges / vendettas. --Wolbo (talk) 13:53, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Intergovernmental Renewable Energy Organization, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Acroterion   (talk)   17:16, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   17:28, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Intergovernmental Renewable Energy Organization for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Intergovernmental Renewable Energy Organization is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Intergovernmental Renewable Energy Organization until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. L.tak (talk) 18:01, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did at IIMSAM. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -  Acroterion   (talk)   04:35, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Reply at Talk:Casualty (series 27)
– The Welsh Buzzard''  – 09:18, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:37, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited IIMSAM, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elissa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:56, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Acroterion   (talk)   12:30, 4 June 2013 (UTC)


 * This account has consistently edited Sulaiman Al-Fahim with an apparent agenda, inserting phrases like "Media claimed founder", "has been on a rapid downward slide ever since", "Though the claims made by Arabian Business about Al-Fahim need to be professionally validated" (then why is the claim being included if it's doubtful?), together with a series of statements about false or disputed claims to certain titles or honorifics: again, if they're disputed they have no place in a biography. This has happened before, and I've blocked because the previous block has not changed this editor's practices or emphasis on casting aspersions and including poorly sourced information and speculation. There also appears to be an agenda concerning Remigio Maradona (see the top of this page) and IIMSAM: while much of what has been added to IIMSAM, (and has been reverted by an IP, probably related to a user that made legal threats in January) was sourced, much is not sourced, and given the contentious nature of the subject, it must be scrupulously sourced and verifiable. As another editor noted on this page in October, "Please note that Wikipedia is not a platform for soapboxing or settling personal grudges / vendettas."   Acroterion   (talk)   13:47, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Dear Acroterion, I disagree with your lofty assumptions and interpretations. However, you are free to have them. Well, Media did claim Sulaiman Al Fahim to be a founder. Whether he is or is not is for the appropriate authorities to decide. Since it was claimed by Media, what is wrong in terming it as 'media claimed founder.' Losing almost 80 places in three years, infact, 79 places in three years. Shall it not be called a rapid downward slide or do you think nosedive or freefall is a better word. While the matter of ranking is very clear, however, if you read carefully, my additions said 'the claims made by Arabian Business about Al-Fahim need to be professionally validated.' Arabian Business did confer Sulaiman Al-Fahim with the title of 'Doctor' which was denied by his own representative Ivo Illic Gabbara. Hence, there is a humble request to validate the claims as having an increasing global footprint and having a freefall in ranking as most powerful Arab are mutually exclusive. About IIMSAM, prominent sources such as the UN, Fox News who did a diligent report on IIMSAM, Remigio Maradona's own website, news reports in the Press with proper references have been provided. Shall providing correct information not be on one's agenda along with refraining from smoking in public places, voting in elections, and safe sex to protect against HIV/AIDS. This is my opinion. However, another editor like you are free to have their own opinions but please refrain from raping the correct information which is properly sourced. Paucity of time makes me focus on selective subjects, however, as an average human has a vocabulary of 35,000 words; in the due course of time, I shall try to increase my topics of interest to 15,000. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jageshwar (talk • contribs)


 * The issue here is your willingness to comply with Wikipedia policy on biographies of living persons, which require a very conservative approach to editing and referencing biographies. You've been repeatedly warned about this, but have not changed your editing practices. Negative coverage is not precluded, but it must be scrupulously sourced to high-quality references, should not include commentary, and may not be used as a platform for denigration. Please review WP:BLP in detail.   Acroterion   (talk)   15:10, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

What is very unfortunate is that you are not following what you are suggesting; and have applied yourself to vandalism by not being objective. You removed my addition of the Arabian List 2013. Going by your action, does one construe that the biography is not of a living person; and hence you deleted the most recent addition of 2013. This seriously questions your intention. The second instance is about the newsreport in the Spanish Media about the Valencia Football Club or about the person being the Sheikh etc. Did you go through the news reports from reputed Spanish newspapers and the links that I had added ? You could have used google translator to comprehend what it actually said rather than going for action before comprehension. But being judgemental rather than being objective is much easier for many blokes like you who do not apply themselves, but immediately involve in cyber arson.Or there is a particular reason for it that you might be better aware of?


 * Please don't abuse multiple accounts: User:Sporadic2013 has been blocked as a sockpuppet intended to evade this account's block.  Acroterion   (talk)   03:26, 7 June 2013 (UTC)


 * In response to your commentary above the second unblock request, it is not the role of administrators to comb through contributions to decide which edits might be good enough to be kept out of a series of problematic edits. You mixed reasonable edits with denigration. Your actions with your sockpuppet account indicate that you have paid some attention to my concerns, and if you take care to respect WIkipedia policy on biographies, then there won't be any problem in the future. As for IIMSAM, both you and the IP have been clearly editing from opposing agendas, and neither of you are working toward a neutral discussion of the topic.   Acroterion   (talk)   03:52, 7 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Other users and administrators have been consistent in their concern about your apparent editing motivation and problematic behavior with biographies. The existence of non-controversial edits (which have been allowed to stand) does not remove the concern about a long-term pattern of poorly-sourced edits of a disparaging nature. Your arguments above indicate that you are not willing to alter your behavior and that you see Wikipedia as a battleground. You are trying to use a conciliatory comment on my part to attack others, which has dug a deeper hole for you.  Since you clearly aren't willing to take advice and abide by Wikipedia policies, I don't see any point in further discussion.  If you use this page as a platform for attacks on others, your talkpage access may be removed.  Acroterion   (talk)   12:40, 7 June 2013 (UTC)