User talk:Jagged 85/Archive 2

Great Work!
Great work on Indian mathematics related articles like Kerala School! Keep it up!!! deeptrivia (talk) 15:15, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Edit summary
Hi. Just a request. I would like to ask you to use an edit summary when you contribute. That is especially important when you add sensitive information, like history, dates, etc, and as well as for any big edits. I hope you don't mind. :) Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 17:05, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

Request for edit summary
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this: The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature. When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. – Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 03:38, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Hangul
Hi. I see you've updated the Brahmic family page to include Hangul. I was under the impression that although Hangul is a phonemic, it's not a Brahmi descendent. It would be good if you could clarify this. Thanks. Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 01:34, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Excellent work!
Thank you for filling up the List of largest empires! You did a great job! Just what I thought I'll manage when I created that page, but I miserably failed in finding any sources. :-( Tell me, you used only http://www.hostkingdom.net/earthrul.html, or any other source? --Dijxtra 10:21, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Ancient history
Hey Jagged85! Good edits on the Ancient History article. This article is devoid of any mention of Indian History. It reads like a European history article (see especially the timeline). You might be interested in joining WikiProject History of India. deeptrivia (talk) 03:37, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

List of people known as father or mother of something
Thanks for your (sorely-needed) India-related additions to this list. I've taken the liberty of editing them a little, in a way I hope you find acceptable. One of the criteria I used was to distinguish between research/discovery and honors bestowed, removing mention of the latter. Thanks again for your contribution, David Kernow 16:41, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Please be careful adding names to the list; it's for people known explicitly as "the father/mother of [thing]", not necessarily a list of people who were the originators or leaders of something.--ragesoss 06:47, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

History of computer science
Thank you for your contributions to history of computer science. You may be interested in WikiProject Computer science. I do have one request for you, could you please fill out the edit summaries when you save your edits, by doing so you provide a great service to your fellow edits. Cheers, —Ruud 16:16, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Rational Trigonometry
I've flagged rational trigonometry as something needing expert attention (the expertise needed is not entirely mathematical, this is an issue in popular mathematics and something of a current event). You seem to have far too much on your plate to get involved personally but perhaps you have some thoughts as to who should take it up. See Talk:rational trigonometry. Abu Amaal 16:38, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Madhava and approximation to π
Recently at History of π, you removed the discussion of Madhava's formula:


 * $$\pi = \sqrt{12}\left(1-{1\over 3\cdot3}+{1\over5\cdot 3^2}-{1\over7\cdot 3^3}+\cdots\right)$$

and replaced it with the much less accurate and less interesting series:


 * $$\frac{\pi}{4} = 1 - \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{5} - \frac{1}{7} + \cdots \pm \frac{1}{2n -1}$$

Why did you do this? Were you correcting some error? It is well-documented that Madhava did indeed discover the first formula. -- Dominus 15:25, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar
Hey Jagged 85, I've been watching your contributions for a long time now. Here's something you thoroughly deserve.

Also, I've been working on Nakshatra and its subarticles. It still requires a big amount of work. Was just wondering if you'd be interested in taking a look. Regards, deeptrivia (talk) 01:14, 9 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks a lot for the award! Now I have something good to add to my home user page. I'm not sure if I'll be any help in Nakshatra though, since I'm no expert in constellations, but I'll check it out. Once again, thank you. Jagged 85 05:09, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Japanese language classification
Hi, Jagged 85. Thanks for making me provide a references for the page. I should put more in, and maybe I'll get around to that someday. It does need more work, and I put some more in due to your edits.

In the future, rather than just delete something that is not referenced, you might consider adding the "citation needed" tag, which you do by typing 2 left curly brackets, fact and 2 right curly brackets. Take it to the talk page, too!

Also, just so you know, lots of languages have only one liquid consonant; it's not a particularly interesting fact, and does little, by itself, to advance a genetic relation. In fact, there are lots of related languages that have differing numbers of liquids: some varieties of Spanish have four; Italian and French have three; and (AFAIK) all Germanic languages have two, yet they're all related. Similarly, Fijian has three and Hawaiian has one, and they're related, too. Best, Godfrey Daniel 07:35, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

List of Indian Monarchs
I had absolutely no idea this page was in existence and I was planning to do a similar page, but the said page is done and I must say in excellent fashion. Thank you for the clarification of the Janjua Shahi reference, I am obliged and grateful to you for this. Especially for the fact that you also stood firm and reverted the 'questionable' rv by a now banned extremist user. Your tireless efforts in working for various other India and Asian related articles leaves me no choice to give you a barnstar for your tireless efforts bro. See your new homepage ;-) --Raja 11:11, 3 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the barnstar! I really appreciate it. I'll make sure to continue contributing tirelessly, like the tireless contributor I am. By the way, which extremist user were you referring to? Jagged 16:34, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Granary at COTW
I have nominated Granary at WP:COTW. If you want you can help... --Francisco Valverde 17:41, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:FFX-2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:FFX-2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 03:10, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Important article that was missing altogether
Hi Jagged85. I was quite surprised that Wikipedia had no mention of the metallurgist Nagarjuna. I just created an article. Please link it on relevant articles related to ancient Indian science. deeptrivia (talk) 04:06, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Best selling RPG
Hi there!

I don't want to seem like I'm antagonzing you in the Computer role-playing game article by reverting the FFVII statement; I love that game and believe it is definitely the most popular game associated with the traditional RPG genre. However, if Pokémon is to be considered a part of the RPG genre, then Pokémon Red and Blue/Pokémon Green are most likely the best selling games. The List of best-selling computer and video games would confirm this, but, unfortunately, most of the information there is taken from http://www.everythingandnothing.org.uk/vg/worldtotals.php

I have nothing against that site, but it can't be considered reliable if it doesn't even provide information on its own references and sources. I've read in at least three different sites that world-wide video game sales data is hard to come by since it's hard to keep track of (even by the game companies themselves) and can easily be exaggerated, so we may never know exactly which single game is the best seller today. I think, in the long run, it's best if article avoids stating that " is the best selling RPG to date." That way, we wouldn't have to change the information on the CRPG article every time the list of best-selling games changes, assuming the information on that page would always be up to date and completely accurate.

Peace, User:White Agent 14:39, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Babylonian mathematics
Hi Jagged. I've removed some text you added to Babylonian mathematics, as a possible copyright violation (see Talk:Babylonian mathematics). Paul August &#9742; 15:24, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Hi jagged, I see you've reinserted some of the text I removed with the edit summary "restored pieces of text not copied from the History of Mathematics archive", I assume that text is free of copywrite problems? Could you please comment on Talk:Babylonian mathematics as to the origins of that text. Thanks Paul August &#9742; 18:08, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Indian Mathematics &mdash; calculus
Hey! Really impressed by your work on Indian mathematics. Good work. I had a little doubt that I wish to clear. Hope you can help me in this regard. According to the Kerala School article, the Yuktibhasa is the world's fist calculus text. But from what I read in the Bhaskara article, Siddhanta Shiromani describes preliminary concepts of infinitesimal calculus and mathematical analysis, along with a number of results in trigonometry, differential calculus and integral calculus. If that is the case, then how can the book by Kerala school be the first text on calculus? I hope you can give a speedy reply, 'coz the Yuktibhasa article could get into DYK. Thanks! And happy editing! -- thunderboltza.k.a.D e epu Joseph13:00, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Economy of India FAR
Hi

You look to be a contributor to this article, which is about to go into FARC unless we can get some input from economics people. A few of us, including me, have put a great effort into copy-editing and other improvements.

Can you assist? There are a number of unaddressed inline queries, and IMV the article needs more depth in a few places.

Tony 10:55, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

In heliocentrism
dear sir. You said that the year with 365.2468 mean period is defined in shathpath brahmana. The year with mean period of 365.2468 comes when we take the 19 year cycle of lunar calender with 7 leap years, as in case of Hebrew calender. see. In case of Hindu calender, we generally follow this cycle but there have been instances when the leap year was skipped (i suppose 1982), or it came with a gap of just one year (like in 1999) instead of usual gap of two years. If you take the average of Hindu calender for 5000 years, you will get a figure closer to 365.2422, (more accurate than Gregorian calender with 365.2425). nids 06:11, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Wikibooks
Hello! Can you contribute to the Urdu Wikibook (in Wikibooks) Please?

Thanks and Successfully!!!

Historiography
Hey, thanks for your contribution. It's important that Islamic historiography be included, but I don't know enough about it (anything at all, really) to add anything of quality. I appreciate your contribution. -- TheMightyQuill 05:28, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi
Hi Jagged 85, I think you have done a excellent job on one of the battles of the second Anglo-Sikh war- well done. I think it would be brillant if you could do the same for them all (they seriously need work - i will help you also). Here is a reference to get you started, best wishes--Sikh historian 19:44, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Sockpuppet
User:129.112.109.250 may be a sockpuppet for user:kennethtennyson, both have the same views about India, and a habit of following me around on wikipedia. Best watch out for the sockpuppet and it's anti-India stance in articles like Hindutva, History of calculus etc. I Informed you because I noticed you were editors in some of those articles as well. Freedom skies 18:56, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Metal Gear Series
Hello Jagged 85! I am writing to you about the wikibook Metal Gear Series. We at wikibooks have voted to keep this book under the following two conditions: This book represents an experiment for our community to determine whether videogames or other non-book narrative media can be properly annotated on wikibooks. If you are not willing/able to contribute to this book, or if you don't know anybody else who is willing to try, then the book will likely be deleted. --User:Wknight8111 (WB:Whiteknight) 13:58, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) That this book is listed as an annotated text, not a videogame strategy guide.
 * 2) That you (or some other user) actively contribute to this book, to make it into an acceptable book, and not simply a conglomeration of related articles.

Martial race
Hi, since you do contribute to Dravidian and related articles, I though you'd chip in with the controversial Martial Race ideology. Basically I have a dispute with another user whi hasn't properly read the citations, confuses one thing for another and doesn't seem to grasp subcontinent history as a whole; yet insists on editing. Some help there would, um, help. Tx. Idleguy 19:22, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Pehlwani
I am sure that there is much that you and I do not agree on, but your recent edits have been reasonable ones and a reasonable man deserves to be reasoned with.

The introductory sentence of Pehlwani is attributed to a specific source (Joseph Alter) and what that source says is that the indigenous Hindu form of wrestling that is a source for Pehlwani dates back at least to the 11th century AD, not the 5th century BC, which is what your new edit says.

In other words, the source cited no longer supports the sentence in question.

Therefore, the citation should be removed or the sentence changed to accurately reflect the content of the cited source.

JFD 22:24, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

I just verified your American Ethnologist citation (JSTOR, if you must know) and it checks out. (Of course, it's at the end, in the footnotes, but it still checks out.)

Nice job. JFD 22:58, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

A note
I noticed that you have been contributing extensively on projects related to Indian martial arts and martial arts in general. Just wanted to say hello and happy editing. Freedom skies 18:38, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Tetralemma
Thanks for your corrections, I like them a lot! -- itistoday (Talk) 19:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

I am very pleased with you -well done!
You have an excellent job on the Jat article well-done but also put it on your watchlist so you can protect from Vandals and vandalism- ok, protect it from vandal, if vandal comes just revert it. Well-done once again.--Jat78 13:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Citation page numbers
What you've done with citations definitely makes references sections less cluttered.

However, is there a way to preserve the page number?

It makes verifying citations so much easier. JFD 03:54, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

List of largest empires
You have done really a good job with that article.

Foreign influence on Chinese martial arts
Kindly take a look here and vote if you support this article being merged into Bodhidharma, the martial arts, and the disputed India connection. Cheers and a Happy New Year. Freedom skies 06:27, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for improving my page! Thats so nice!

Ayesha Takia 22:11, 31 December 2006 (UTC)