User talk:Jagiesta

Lucas Baiano
Another editor has added the  template to the article Lucas Baiano, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 18:00, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Lucas Baiano
I have nominated Lucas Baiano, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Lucas Baiano. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. -- lucasbfr  talk 00:06, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

April 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Talk:Lucas Baiano has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Steve Crossin  (talk to me)  01:41, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 02:39, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

When will this issue be settled with? As of now its state is at "keep", clearly the links were just corrected/updated. Please do not remove the links as updated. Feel free to let me know. Thanks ` Jagiesta

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 05:58, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest. Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:47, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

September 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:57, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * You have again removed the maintenance tag, albeit while logged out (here). Please do not remove maintenance tags from the article without addressing their concerns. That tag exists to draw a volunteer to remedy the problem. Removing the tag otherwise is not constructive. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:12, 5 September 2008 (UTC)