User talk:Jaguar/Archive 23

Peer review/Eega/archive1
Jaguar, thanks for the brief c/e on Tamannaah filmography, which i guess is not complete yet. When you are done with it and are really free, can you please leave your comments there? I wish to make Eega a FA and i opine that your suggestions would help me improve it. Regards, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:50, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that, I unexpectedly went out last night at didn't return until two in the morning! I'll finish the copyedit on Tamannaah filmography, and will take a look at Eega later. Sorry for the delay. JAG  UAR   11:05, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * All done with the copyedit now, ! Excellent work with the article. JAG  UAR   11:17, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the timely help, Jaguar. All the best for your current FAC. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:07, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Haven't been too lucky, Jaguar. The list has lost its stability within hours after your c/e, and it reached a conclusion today. So, rather than waiting and sitting idle, i've listed it at the GOCE. Hoping for the best. :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:53, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry to hear that, it must have been annoying. They should be reprimanded for disruptive editing. JAG  UAR   17:06, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
 * That user didn't even stop after a level III warning. When Oshwah gave a final one, he came down and threw a message making his intentions clear. If he would have conveyed the same to me much earlier, it would have been sorted out amicably. Now, a delay for at least one month. Still, its okay. I will concentrate on Eega meanwhile. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:09, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you could revert to the last stable revision? It's up to you, but on the bright side, it's good that the GOCE can copyedit it. JAG  UAR   17:18, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Oshwah did it for me. I made the required changes later before requesting at the GOCE. Till then, i shall focus on mu current plans (need to revisit those films again soon). As per Dr. Blofeld's barter deal (one for one), i am completing viewing The Naked Gun trilogy. Should do it soon before revisiting The Godfather. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:23, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I haven't forgot about Eega, I'll get on it soon. I've been set back lately! I watched all of the Naken Gun films when I was 11-12, I like films with a good sense of humour. I got so many films to watch that I never get to watching them at all... JAG  UAR   22:28, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you Yash! JAG  UAR   11:15, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
 * BTW, can you please leave your comments here ? Yashthepunisher (talk) 11:38, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'll take a look later. JAG  UAR   12:18, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 GA Cup-Round 3
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:22, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Contest award
Hi Jaguar congratulations on completing the Awaken the Dragon contest! Could you please email me at karla.marte@wikimedia.org.uk from the email in which you want your prize to be sent to?. Thank you. Karla Marte(WMUK) —Preceding undated comment added 11:00, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

David Cameron article
Hi, I noticed that you are reviewing the Cameron article for GA and I took a look over it myself. I am quite interested in UK politics and have a lot of experience with biography articles. I've checked the referencing and I've found multiple issues. I've posted them below, and it might save you having to go through it in such detail. As a note, the full references are copied out with comments after them; the references have lost their formatting in the process, but that doesn't matter.

These aren't exhaustive, but it's a start. They can all be fixed easily by the nominator. Anyway, hopefully I've helped out there. Cheers, —Noswall59 (talk) 22:31, 3 May 2016 (UTC).
 * Thanks for that, ! The broken formats could be fixed with ReFill I think, and the rest could be fixed by the nominator. It could take some time as I see additional comments have been left at the GAN. JAG  UAR   16:54, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

David Cameron GA
Will get round to it tonight. Thank you for the feedback. -- PatientZero  talk 07:00, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. I hadn't realised you changed your name! JAG  UAR   16:54, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

WikiCup 2016 May newsletter


Round 2 is over and 35 competitors have moved on to Round 3.

Round 2 saw three FAs (two by and one by ), four Featured Lists (with three by ), and 53 Good Articles (six by  and five each by, , and ). Eleven Featured Pictures were promoted (six by and five by ). One Featured Portal, Featured Topic and Good Topic were also promoted. The DYK base point total was 1,135. scored 265 base points, while and  each scored 150 base points. Eleven ITN were promoted and 131 Good Article Reviews were conducted with completing a staggering 61 reviews. Two contestants, and, broke the 700 point mark for Round 2.

If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Thanks to everyone for participating, and good luck to those moving into round 2. ,, and -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

FAC
Hey Jaguar! I just re-nominated Kalki Koechlin's article for FAC, since you have been a part of the previous discussions I would appreciate your comments. Thank you! Numerounovedant  Talk  12:47, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

GA Cup-Round 3 Clarification
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 06:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

GA review HMS Thunderer (1872)
Andy Dingley (talk) 20:26, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Resident Evil 6 and 1UP
For some reasons, I can't enter the 1UP sites used in Resident Evil 6 or even using archive sites. Maybe you should search other sources besides 1UP before the review. Anyway, Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 01:08, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up, . For some reason they worked before, and now they appear to be broken because of robot.txt. Yeah, I'll see what I can do. JAG  UAR   13:41, 10 May 2016 (UTC)


 * For some reason 1UP.com is still alive. If you want to avoid robots I would advise you to use www.webcitation.org Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 17:14, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Never used that. I wish IGN and co would turn off their robot.txt. JAG  UAR   20:35, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Resident Evil 6
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Resident Evil 6 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 04:40, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts
The article Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 07:00, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts
The article Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 12:41, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

DKC2
I checked back recently on this article that I'd worked on for a while and was surprised to find it a good article. Thank you for completing the development section I had so much trouble with! And also for the making it GA as well!! I see that you didn't delete much of the work I'd done so thank you for that as well! NarSakSasLee (talk) 00:19, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
 * No problem, ! Thanks for building it up in the first place. I want to start with DKC3 next, but unfortunately nothing can be found for development so I'm stuck. JAG  UAR   17:09, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Anbe Sivam PR
Hello, Jaguar. I've listed the article for PR here as I wish to take it to FA. Feel free to leave comments. Thanks. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me 01:18, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I haven't forgotten! I'll take a look at it soon. JAG  UAR   19:09, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nightshade (1985 video game)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nightshade (1985 video game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 16:20, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nightshade (1985 video game)
The article Nightshade (1985 video game) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Nightshade (1985 video game) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 16:01, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Encouraged to try again
Thank you for your helpful comments in the first FAC of Reger's Requiem. Please look if any concerns are left, I try again, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:07, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for helpful comments in the FAC! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:45, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Resident Evil 6
The article Resident Evil 6 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Resident Evil 6 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 07:40, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Museum of Modern Art of Algiers
Hi Jaguar, i was recently looking at the above article and noticed that you added the British Overseas Territories project to its talkpage last year. just wondering what the relevance is, thanks. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:18, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for pointing that out. It seems to be a mistake from months ago, as I added tags that were included in the "British Overseas Territories" category. Not sure why that article is in that category, but I've removed it. JAG  UAR   13:20, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * thanks for your promptness, heres a kitten Coolabahapple (talk) 13:25, 22 May 2016 (UTC)



This comes close
Hello J. The COI report about is, as you so rightly point out, laughable. It can't even be an April 1st prank since we are weeks beyond that date :-) Dr B's post about Sofana D is a great response. FYI last year I was part of one moment almost as silly. Here is a link to it Talk:Kareem Abdul-Jabbar so you can have a chuckle. Cheers and happy (but not silly) editing! MarnetteD&#124;Talk 21:28, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that, ! I can't believe that some people here do throw silly COI accusations at others, but I'm glad to know that I'm not alone. Misery loves company! I did chuckle at that. :-P JAG  UAR   21:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Resident Evil 6
The article Resident Evil 6 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Resident Evil 6 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 12:41, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Congrats jaguar.Tintor2 (talk) 14:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I guess some credit goes to good ol' Niemti too. :-P JAG  UAR   15:53, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wipeout Pure
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wipeout Pure you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tintor2 -- Tintor2 (talk) 18:40, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wipeout Pure
The article Wipeout Pure you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Wipeout Pure for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tintor2 -- Tintor2 (talk) 20:01, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Allen Walker
In the past weeks, me and other users have been trying make Allen Walker into adding a GA. I might have nominated the article to GA, but I've gotta share the credits with other users. If by any chance you could review I'd be grateful. My main concern is that if people not familiar with the series could understand the article. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 23:25, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'll be happy to review it. It looks well written overall. JAG  UAR   10:33, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I already tried doing some edits.Tintor2 (talk) 22:13, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Cool! I'll keep an eye on it, if you'd let me know when you're done... JAG  UAR   22:22, 30 May 2016 (UTC)


 * I already did some like removing minor info. Can't tell if it's still passable.Tintor2 (talk) 18:34, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * It should be good to go now, . I've read through it again and I think it meets the criteria. Nice work! JAG  UAR   18:37, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review.Tintor2 (talk) 18:42, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Featured article candidates/Eega/archive1
Thanks for commenting at the now archived peer review for Eega. The article is currently at FAC and i look forward for constructive comments from you. Yours friendly, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 03:03, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I will take a look at it soon. JAG  UAR   20:19, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Rossini
Would you have time to review Rossini's Petite messe solennelle for GA soon, - expanded from a strangely detailed version, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:07, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Sure, opened. JAG  UAR   20:19, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * And done, thank you! - Congrats for your latest FA star! When you nominate at TFAR, please fill also the chart there, - I trust you can do it yourself ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:22, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks ! Did I fill out the TFA form correctly? I hope I did, because it just got promoted in time for its 20th anniversary! (And on that note, mine is coming up a week before). JAG  UAR   20:43, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * You filled the template well, placed it well in the calendar, but it also needs to go to the summary chart, above. If you need help, let me know. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:47, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Done, thanks! I'm still new to being successful with FAs. JAG  UAR   20:49, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey
The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.
 * Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Donkey Kong Country 3: Dixie Kong's Double Trouble!
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Donkey Kong Country 3: Dixie Kong's Double Trouble! you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 22:40, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Donkey Kong Country 3: Dixie Kong's Double Trouble!
The article Donkey Kong Country 3: Dixie Kong's Double Trouble! you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Donkey Kong Country 3: Dixie Kong's Double Trouble! for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 17:01, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 2 June
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Donkey Kong Country 3: Dixie Kong's Double Trouble! page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=723356531 your edit] caused a URL error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F723356531%7CDonkey Kong Country 3: Dixie Kong's Double Trouble!%5D%5D Ask for help])

2016 GA Cup-Finals
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

The Anglesey/Gwynedd Challenge
Planning on runnng this without prizes on June 13-20. If you're interested in contributing put your name down at the bottom of Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Wales/Awaken the Dragon. Thanks.♦ Dr. Blofeld  09:10, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Thank you ! It was a lot of hard work but I'm glad it paid off. JAG UAR   19:17, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Working on a FAC about a complex article from February to June should have been very frustrating, wasn't it? I am truly amazed at your perseverance. What kept you pushing? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:59, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure to come to think of it, I wasn't aware that the FAC would drag out for so long! I thought it was going to fail at one point due to the lack of Japanese coverage, but after spending many hours of searching I finally found some. My ultimate goal was to promote before its 20th anniversary, and am overjoyed that I made in time. Sorry for the late reply, I'm taking some time off wikipedia at the moment! JAG  UAR   16:26, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Hardwork did pay richly. As for the wikibreak, i know. Anti-EU demonstrations. All the best. :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:31, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

GA Review
Hey Jaguar, if you find some time would you mind reviewing Waiting for GA? It's a relatively small article. It would be greatly appreciated! Numerounovedant  Talk  12:08, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Never mind. Numerounovedant   Talk  12:38, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I understand, let me know if you want to have it reviewed and I'll be happy to do so. JAG  UAR   19:17, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Whenever you back I would appreciate you could find some time to have a look at the GAR. Numerounovedant   Talk  17:33, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Cary Grant problems remain
Please note the ones I point out at the GA review page, I would hate to have to contest this for sure, but I suggest that it is not ready for prime-time. Collect (talk) 15:41, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Neither are you ready for prime time Collect, in fact you wouldn't make a 4 am slot on the Price Drop channel. You represent everything wrong with wikipedia and the snivelling, tedious little oiks which operate here sneaking around and trying to hamper the efforts of others to promote their own agenda. If you "contest" the promotion, you'll have proved me and eveyrbody else here who thinks you a tedious bore right...

Oh and happy 7th birthday Jaguar!♦ Dr. Blofeld  15:55, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Wow - what an erudite examination of the problems pointed out. By the way, I have been around for ten years as well, but I guess you did not notice. A GA review which takes under two full hours, I suppose, is your idea of adequate time. Neither of mine were anywhere near as rapid. Oh - you probably should turn spell check "on". y the way, my "agenda" is clear in the Joseph Widney article. Collect (talk) 16:30, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I executed the review quickly; I initiated it and immediately began reviewing it. I didn't wait 24 hours like I usually do, as I know Dr. Blofeld spent a lot of time on the article and I wanted his hard work to pay off. If people think there are issues with the article, I want it done in a neutral manner. JAG  UAR   16:49, 15 June 2016 (UTC)


 * It's not in my nature to drop on user talk pages, but telling another editor to "extract your head from your arse" is not going to win you any friends. There was no need to say that. Ritchie333 (talk)  (cont)  15:19, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * It was this which did it for me. I had no issue with his concerns at the GA review but to do ask to take me down as a judge (which requires you marking scores for reviews based on only their lengths and dates) was out of order. When I wrote that message I sat there for a couple of minutes and wondered if it was a good idea to hit save, but I did it any way. If he apologises to me then I will apologise also, but I don't know if it will happen. I had nothing but respect for him and it shocked me that he did that. Thanks for taking a look at the Grant review. I'm trying to take a short break and refresh myself in the mean time. JAG  UAR   15:29, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I think you've over-reacted. I don't think Eric knows anything about the cup and just expressing his view. In your shoes I probably wouldn't have replied as no direct reply is necessary - I would see what the other judges think. I don't know anything about Collect or what on earth he's done to Blofeld (or vice versa), but he makes two good points; the "Rumours about sexual orientation" and "Use of LSD" are controversial enough to require close examination and would benefit from a wider range of sources, and the quotation boxes may be overlong and invite claims of close-paraphrasing. It's best just to take the comments on content as they are, and ignore the "wrapping" of how they are delivered - you'll go mad otherwise. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  15:50, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the advice. I've deleted my comment at the GAN, if it's true that Eric wasn't aware of the GA Cup's focus. If the judges think that I haven't done a good job, then I'll step down. Even though the review was executed in two hours, I spent the whole time giving the article my undivided attention. I didn't have anything else open in my tabs and I spent almost two hours straight reading through the article for prose errors, and for me that's a long time to do something in a straight run. I think I'm going to stop doing GA reviews for a while now. JAG  UAR   15:58, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Good idea. I think it would be as well if you stopped doing GA reviews. Eric   Corbett  16:00, 16 June 2016 (UTC)


 * I think it's not so much the time you spent, but what you did during it. Admittedly, I had the advantage of seeing Collect's comments up-front, but a GA claiming Cary Grant is gay in the lead and a section in the body had better be backed up with a Google search showing sources to match. I am crestfallen. So in about five minutes, I have a major red flag to put in the review - sorry. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  16:11, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Ritchie, please stop commenting on things you know little about. I've read seven books and heavily researched this. The article did no such thing as claim he was gay, not even the lede. Every major biography of Cary Grant extensively discusses Grant and Scott's relationship bringing up the nature of it, even the neutral biographers think it was worth mentioning in quite some detail, so much so that there was some weight placed on it in the article discussion quite rightly as we report what reputable sources extensively disucss. I didn't name headers "rumors", other people did that. At the time I wrote the lede I simply summarised the article fully. Now I've condensed it to barely a few lines then it's not worth mentioning. The lede did summarize what is widely documented in dozens of reputable sources. SImilarly the use of LSD is covered extensively with chapters devoted to it even in all the major biographies, and even his own daughter verifies that. So please stop talking about red flags and have some respect for me.♦ Dr. Blofeld  17:56, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

DKC3 Citations
Hello. I noticed that, while you really beefed up the Donkey Kong Country 3 article, you also removed many of the citations I added. I don't edit Wikipedia that often, and it's even rarer when I make big edits like I myself did for DKC3, but I thought that having more citations was a good thing, especially since it said the article needed more citations. When does it become too much? Condontdoit296 (talk) 23:03, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, I'm sorry about that! I didn't realise, when I bring articles to GA I usually nuke them or rebuild them from the bottom up. The citations I removed from that article were either dead, unformatted or I replaced them with newer links or new citations entirely. If they were relevant to the prose I would have kept them. Do you want me to go through the history and try to add them back? JAG  UAR   13:44, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I mean, a lot of them were in the Plot section as just quotes from the game, and there were some other sources elsewhere. Adding them back would be nice, I guess, but the formatting I put on them may be off. I also thought the information about the GBA port was relevant, especially how they wanted to include both soundtracks. So if you have much time to spare, unlike me, then help yourself! Condontdoit296 (talk) 17:07, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Break
Enjoy your break. Much needed I think. Yes at the moment with the hostility and the peak of the hayfever season feels head feels pretty bunged up at the moment! ♦ Dr. Blofeld  16:26, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:25, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Today we enjoy Nights into Dreams..., thank you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:29, 5 July 2016 (UTC)