User talk:Jai22

September 2017
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  09:56, 13 September 2017 (UTC)


 * As was already mentioned to your most recent sock -- Dean077, representatives of OMICS are community banned. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  06:08, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Dear  Spiff  OMICS users may be banned from OMICS wiki site, not from entire wiki editing. That might be different discussion. You are violating wiki rules. Please unblock my account. Jai22 (talk) 06:41, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 * That is incorrect, see Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive906. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:08, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

I am copying for your reference. Please read "site ban representatives of OMICS Publishing Group" for OMICS wiki site only, even to OMICS site "People with direct COI have a right to contribute only if they do it reasonably; The continual advocacy that has marked their contributions is unacceptable. Therefore future blocks can be enacted citing this ANI case as the rationale"

The proposal by Nomoskedasticity to site ban representatives of OMICS Publishing Group has been carried by clear consensus of the community. An article ban for Nomoskedasticity suggested by Tiptoethrutheminefield did not gain traction. The claim in the single oppose by Tiptoethrutheminefield that a blanket ban is impossible to enforce may be accurate but physical blocking of identifiable users can be carried out under the aegis of the consensus carried by this discussion and adequately summed up succinctly by DGG: The simplest way to handle this is to think of them as meatpuppets. People with direct COI have a right to contribute only if they do it reasonably; The continual advocacy that has marked their contributions is unacceptable. Therefore future blocks can be enacted citing this ANI case as the rationale.

THe actual OMICS Publishing Group article which has been kept is tangential to the ban discussion and appears to have had no effect on the community's decision here.

I request Boing! said Zebedee and  Spaceman  read carefully and take the decision. Apologies, if I commit any mistake. Here with I am reconfirming that i will follow the wiki contributor guidelines for editing. Jai22 (talk) 07:22, 17 September 2017 (UTC)