User talk:Jaiganesh17

January 2016
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jai Akash, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 12:21, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Jai Akash shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 331dot (talk) 12:36, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

I urge you to discuss any concerns about the page on its talk page; note that you cannot remove information because it is 'bad'; Wikipedia includes most information that can be cited regardless of whether it is good or bad. If you have questions about this, please ask. 331dot (talk) 12:48, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Jaiakash is a kind hearted helping gentleman and a famous celebrity. So, please don't put false news about him, which can damage his name. Thank you

Kind regards Jaiganesh Jaiganesh17 (talk) 12:57, 22 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Please explain how the information is "false", as it all was cited with what seem to be reliable sources. Note that we post all types of information about people, good and bad. 331dot (talk) 12:58, 22 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Articles carry false news for sale. Jaiganesh17 (talk) 13:01, 22 January 2016 (UTC)


 * I am not sure what that means, but you cannot remove information for the sole reason of improving someone's image; that is not a concern of Wikipedia, unless you believe the Biography of Living Persons policy has been violated by the information. To me, this did not seem to be the case. If you have further comment, please post it here. 331dot (talk) 13:04, 22 January 2016 (UTC)


 * If you going to put everything that comes in articles. Then, why didn't you put the news that Jaiakash is the first lover of Vicar's wife Sangeeta? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaiganesh17 (talk • contribs)
 * I can't speak as to why certain information might be missing, perhaps it just has not been added yet. The main point I have is that you cannot just remove information to improve someone's image. That is not a concern of Wikipedia; we have much information that is 'bad' or 'negative' about people.  As long as information can be reliably cited, it can be here.  Now, if you are saying that the source of the information is not a reliable source, or that the information violates some part of the Biography of Living Persons policy, that is another matter.  331dot (talk) 13:13, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * In such situations, you should post a clear explanation on the article's talk page explaining your reasoning. 331dot (talk) 13:14, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Vandalism
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at IMDB. Canterbury Tail  talk  16:52, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Onnam Raagam


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Onnam Raagam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. noq (talk) 18:14, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kaatrullavarai


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Kaatrullavarai requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. noq (talk) 18:14, 29 September 2016 (UTC)