User talk:Jake Fuersturm/Archive 2

Notice to any Admin coming along to review the above block
'''Can you please review the below exchange between MikeWazowski and myself. I believe this is a violation of the agreement which led to my block, as user Erikeltic has now recruited an associate to act as proxy to continue the prohibited discussion on my talk page, in order to avoid the appearance of violating the agreement.''' -- Jake Fuersturm (talk) 11:20, 3 June 2011 (UTC)


 * For the record, it appears that Sarek blocked you of his own accord - I don't see any recent edits from Erikeltic that request that you be blocked. He just commented that your rude behavior had continued. Not the same thing. MikeWazowski (talk) 21:51, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * That's pretty disingenuous. Erik's clever enough to know the likely result of his remark to Sarek. -- Jake Fuersturm (talk) 22:00, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Just as you should have known when you shot your mouth off on his talk page, after agreeing not to bother him, as Sarek noted above. I'm sorry, but you did bring this on yourself. MikeWazowski (talk) 22:03, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * You (and Erik) aren't doing yourselves any favours by continuing to post here. As far as I'm concerned, posting by proxy is still posting. It's also wildly uncivil to be putting yourself into the middle of a dispute between two other editors when you're neither an admin nor a neutral third party, especially when it's on my talk page.  -- Jake Fuersturm (talk) 22:07, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Erikeltic is now attempting to deflect this through this post. Furthermore, his statement that he and Mike can now "... can work together at this point" is only more evidence of their cooperation in harassing me on my talk page, while the block prevents me from properly defending myself or reporting his behaviour to another admin. -- Jake Fuersturm (talk) 22:24, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Star Trek-Jacob Kogan-Child Spock.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Star Trek-Jacob Kogan-Child Spock.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:38, 3 June 2011 (UTC)