User talk:Jake Glavich

COI notice
Hello, Jake Glavich. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 15:50, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Horten Ho 229—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:27, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacob Glavich (March 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jacob Glavich and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jacob Glavich, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jacob_Glavich Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sulfurboy&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jacob_Glavich reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 16:30, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Horten Ho 229. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 16:53, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Jacob Glavich
Hello, Jake Glavich. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jacob Glavich, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Jacob Glavich


Hello, Jake Glavich. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jacob Glavich".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:09, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Resolved IBSA/IBSF abbreviation
Thank you for your correction to goalball relating to International Blind Sports Federation (IBSA). I have reverted it, but marked it now as not a typo. For your information. Regards, Q8682 (talk) 03:36, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Hugues des Arcis moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Hugues des Arcis, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  DGG ( talk ) 18:44, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Despite the above, the item has been move to mainspace again even though it is not ready for publication. Notability has not been demonstrated and there are no eferences for verification. As such the item cannot remain in mainspace. It will be returned to draft and should be submitted for review when sourcing has been copmpleted. If it is moved to mainspace again without significant imporvement it may be deleted. Eagleash (talk) 18:58, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Hugues des Arcis
Hello, Jake Glavich. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hugues des Arcis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Hugues des Arcis


Hello, Jake Glavich. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hugues des Arcis".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Ji11720 (talk) 19:11, 28 April 2022 (UTC)