User talk:Jake Picasso

Japanese King Kong
Where are you getting your information about Wasei Kingu Kongu? Everything posted on that page is so wrong its not even funny. The film was a silent short produced by Shochiku Studios in 1933 and was based on the 1933 King Kong. Shochiku where the company that distributed the film in Japan on behalf of RKO and made their own silent knock-off of the film. Everything from Tanaka and Honda working on the film together, to Cooper finding the footage, to it being based on a novel etc. is simply wrong.Giantdevilfish (talk) 15:33, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Curse of the Forgotten Crypt
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Curse of the Forgotten Crypt, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 16:23, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

June 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. andy (talk) 16:26, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wasei Kingu Kongu


The article Wasei Kingu Kongu has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability. No sources cited, and no reliable sources found on searching.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:13, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Croft and Taylor (TV Series)
Might I suggest you add to that, or mark it with an tag or have it moved to your user space. S.G.(GH) ping! 20:45, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Croft and Taylor (TV Series)
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Croft and Taylor (TV Series), to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. GILO ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY  21:00, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Joel McCready
A tag has been placed on Joel McCready requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Fei noh a  Talk, My master 13:23, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lambert (Alien)


The article Lambert (Alien) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No references. No indication of relevance.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fabian Hassler (talk) 13:48, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Parker (Alien)


The article Parker (Alien) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No references. No indication of relevance.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fabian Hassler (talk) 13:50, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

June 2010
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. IllaZilla (talk) 17:47, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

AfD Nomination: Ash (Alien)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that Ash (Alien) meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Ash (Alien). Don't forget to add four tildes ( ~ ) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last seven days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. IllaZilla (talk) 02:24, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

June 2010 (continued)
Please do not add hoaxes to Wikipedia, such as you did in the article Mike Parker (EastEnders). Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia in an attempt to test our ability to detect and remove such material. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can make a positive impact. Thank you. Anemone Projectors  17:40, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Predator 2, you may be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:32, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Phil Daniels. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:35, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to List of EastEnders books, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:35, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Highlander: The Reckoning, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Markeer 02:10, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Francisco Inferno


A tag has been placed on Francisco Inferno requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  role player 16:07, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Youth of Muck
A tag has been placed on Youth of Muck requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jimmy Pitt (talk) 17:07, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2020 (continued)
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Hebridea Harland, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. At best this article is a completely unsourced biography of a living person, and since nobody has found any mention of him anywhere else it seems likely that it may be worse than that. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:24, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rocky (remake)
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Rocky (remake), to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 15:27, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Blocked indefinitely
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 15:47, 8 July 2010 (UTC)