User talk:Jakealler

Welcome
Hello, Jakealler and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. If you haven't done so already, we encourage you to go through our training for students.

If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Please also read this helpful advice for students.

Before you create an article, make sure you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.

Your instructor or professor may wish to set up a course page, and if your class doesn't already have one please tell your instructor about that. It is highly recommended that you place this text:  on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and aid your communication with them.

We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished! SPF121188 (talk this way) (contribs) 17:59, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Jakealler, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:21, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Peer Review--Jessie Anthony
The wording for the first edit "at some point" feels a little casual. Consider rewording this to make it more formal and objective. Something like "Later in his studies at the university, tensions arose between him and the institution because he felt they had abandoned their abolitionist history by suppressing a local black community." I would elaborate more on this, too. How were they thought to be suppressing the Black community?

In your sentence about him having to face anti-radical criticism, I would reword to "he faced criticism from anti-radicals opposed to his association with Marxist ideology" or something like that.

Wording of the sentence about testimony is a little confusing. Revise it to something like "Rawick's methodology for the collection was to take the testimony of former slaves and discuss it in his writing, which revolutionized the study of slavery in the 1970s." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jessranthony (talk • contribs) 19:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Jessranthony (talk) 19:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

A goat for you!
You're the Goat!

QuintonHogshead (talk) 19:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC) 

Peer Review
Your lead is up-to-date and acceptable. The introductory sentence is acceptable and is well-written.

I'm going to apologize if you have more of an article written in a word document somewhere, because I can't find anything beyond a few sentences of edits. If this is the sort of thing where life got in the way and you just haven't actually written that much, then it happens. But I do think you need to add a lot more, because as it stands, a few sentences is dangerously thin for an article like this. Just keep that in mind.

I think that this article is rather short. For all of the mention about Rawick's academic work, there is little detailed discussion of the topics covered in those works. For a Wikipedia page about an author who's known for a specific work, I would expect there to be a lengthy summary of the work. What sort of narratives are discussed in the 41-volume work? This would be a good place for you to expand on what you've written already. What sort of people did he interview? What were the interviews like? What stories were collected? the Ph.D. dissertation is also mentioned, and I think that could be cited more.

I'd say to add more about his life, but I understand that it's possible that there isn't much about him.

All that said, your article is rather wordy and non-formal. Words like "Probably" can be cut and made much more succinct. There are few spelling errors that need to be changed. Leftish where it should be Leftist, for example.

QuintonHogshead (talk) 19:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)