User talk:Jakebarrington

Hello! Talk to me!

A barnstar for you!
Meet the Press is a conservative talk show that tries to look like it covers both side. Hence the panelling "conservative propaganda" — Preceding unsigned comment added by DaddyWatkins (talk • contribs) 18:55, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia isn't the place for your opinions. Jakebarrington (talk) 18:58, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

RfA
Hello, Jake. I undid your edits to WP:RFA because you did not follow the instructions for transcluding your nomination. If you'd like to try again, I suggest you re-read the instructions more carefully. However, you might want to consider WP:NOTNOW before you do so. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 10:51, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks. Jakebarrington (talk) 10:53, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bristol Tower


The article Bristol Tower has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ryan Vesey Review me!  17:41, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Why is it purposed for deletion? Sources are reputable and accurate. Page is properly formatted. I don't understand. Please get back to me. Jakebarrington (talk) 18:08, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Requests for adminship/Jakebarrington
Hello Jakebarrington. I noticed that a Requests for Adminship page was created under your name, either by you or by someone else, and I was wondering as to what the status of that request might be. Please note that new users are rarely successful at RfA and that the Wikipedia editing community sets an extremely high bar for potential administrator candidates. That being said, I strongly urge you to read Guide to requests for adminship, Adminship is not for new users, and Not now, and ask you to reconsider whether you really do wish to go through with your candidacy; please understand that you stand very little to no chance of passing RfA at this point and that you are strongly discouraged from running for adminship. If you are still intent on running for adminship with that request and are absolutely positive that this is what you want, please transclude your RfA at WP:RFA by following the instructions at WP:RFA/N; otherwise, I'll go ahead and delete the RfA page for you in about a week or so from today.  Nolelover   Talk · Contribs  17:32, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Why would you issue me a warning though? I didn't break any rules by requesting adminship. Did I? Jakebarrington (talk) 23:03, 31 May 2012 (UTC)


 * It's not supposed to be a warning, just a notification. The big ! sign isn't very friendly though, so I've changed Template:RfA query to use File:Information.svg instead. SmartSE (talk) 11:46, 1 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Jakebarrington (talk) 14:32, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * You're right; my apologies if that notice seemed a little unfriendly. :) This notice is important (it would be a little surprising for you to create an RfA in good-faith and then be blown away by the comments), but it probably doesn't need that warning image. My thanks to Smartse for changing that.  Nolelover   Talk · Contribs  18:45, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Ryan Vesey 15:27, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 113th United States Congress, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tim Ryan, Jim Jordan and David Joyce (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Page numbers
When you are using textbooks as refs either page numbers or chapters are helpful. Best Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 23:42, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
+ I agree that we need something in the code. Dougweller (talk) 14:57, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Showroom logic


A tag has been placed on Showroom logic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. red dogsix (talk) 15:50, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

2019 US Banknote Contest
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)

Nomination of Revuelta Vega Leon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Revuelta Vega Leon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Revuelta Vega Leon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Sungodtemple (talk) 14:29, 20 November 2022 (UTC)