User talk:Jakecnjrv

Your submission at Articles for creation: WeTV (February 22)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:WeTV and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:WeTV, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:WeTV Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:WeTV reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:21, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:WeTV has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:WeTV. Thanks! ~ Ase1este charge-paritytime 07:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Ok, thank you Aseleste, for your comment. I'm new to Wikipedia's editing procedures and obviously to the talk page. Is this how I supposed to reply? Jakecnjrv (talk) 07:08, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:WeTV has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:WeTV. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:22, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: WeTV (February 23)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:WeTV and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:WeTV, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:WeTV Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:WeTV reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:32, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Ok, thank you very much, Robert, for your long and detailed comment. I'm new to Wikipedia's editing procedures and obviously to the talk page. Is this how I supposed to reply? I will follow your guideline and tips in order to meet Wikipedia's standards. I will take a while though. Thank you again for your time.

Here are the main reasons why WeTV needs its own article: 1. WeTV was released in 2019. 腾讯视频 (Tencent Video) was released in 2011. (From Reuters' reports) 2. They have different websites and contents (https://wetv.vip and http://v.qq.com/). 3. Their apps have different UI and UX (Different App IDs on both Google Play and App Store). When users pay for WeTV, they will only have a WeTV membership, not the "腾讯视频" (Tencent Video) membership and vice versa. These two platforms run autonomously from each other. In summary, if you pay for WeTV, you'll get a WeTV membership. If you pay for "腾讯视频" (Tencent Video), you'll get a "Tencent Video" membership. 4. Most importantly, Many people in many areas are confused because when they see the Tencent Video article on Wikipedia, they assume they're the same thing and ended up buying the wrong service. Thus, that makes them suffer a financial loss.

(This discussion has to be on the Tencent Video page as well, I guess?) Thank you, Jake Jakecnjrv (talk) 07:31, 24 February 2021 (UTC)