User talk:Jakers 78

User:USEDfan
Your edits are remarkably similar to the banned user USEDfan, and his many sockpuppets. Many of the edits you are preforming are just as disruptive and counterproductive as his, and it is likely that you will be banned by way of the duck test; or "if it looks like a duck, swims like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's probably a duck." And according to wikipedia's policy on banning, "Anyone is free to revert any edits made in defiance of a ban. By banning a user, the community has decided that their edits are prima facie unwanted and may be reverted without any further reason." I highly suggest you take the advice given to you by other editors. Consider this a warning that if you continue to edit the way you are editing, it is highly probable that you will be banned as a sockpuppet of USEDfan. I am going to revert your most recent edits. If you feel they are valid contributions to the article, discuss so on the individual article's talk page where other editors can weigh in. Also, you say you have been editing for months and yet your edits only date back to June 15, 2009, which is only three weeks from today. Care to explain? Fezmar9 (talk) 20:30, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

RE:Artwork
Ok... but that still does not establish any sort of notability. It also sounds like an advertisement. Most new albums are released with some form of pre-order these days, what makes The Used's so special? Fezmar9 (talk) 18:57, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

__NOINDEX__