User talk:Jakeunrated

AfD nomination of Jake mcdowell's halloween
I have nominated Jake mcdowell's halloween, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Jake mcdowell's halloween. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Redfarmer (talk) 14:14, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

If you want to avoid the article being deleted, the best way is to demonstrate that it has recieved substantial coverage in independent sources; a short article in the local paper unfortunately isn't enough to build an article around. See WP:N and WP:MOVIE for guidelines on what is normally regarded as notable enough for Wikipedia. Also, I assume from your username taht you are Jake McDowell; you should probably read our conflict of interest guidelines, as writing an article about your own work is generally discouraged. Best, Iain99Balderdash and piffle 14:36, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jake McDowell
A tag has been placed on Jake McDowell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jimmy Pitt (talk) 22:44, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Broken hearts (film)


The article Broken hearts (film) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable, unreleased film.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Steamroller Assault (talk) 00:45, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Broken hearts (film)
I have nominated Broken hearts (film), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Broken hearts (film). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Steamroller Assault (talk) 03:08, 8 July 2010 (UTC)