User talk:Jakob.scholbach/Archives/2009/March

An Apology
I want to apologize for my harsh comments. Looking back on what I said (errr... typed), I realize that I replied with anger and took your comments personally. I assume full responsibility for my immature actions, and hope that you will forgive me for being so inconsiderate. You have several good points (others, I am personally not so sure of :-P) and I should have been more keen to accept them. Again, I am sorry for venting my frustration with Una and other editors on you - you did nothing to deserve it. I will try to address your concerns this weekend, but I do have to work tomorrow and Sunday and may be consumed by other homework/studying. Cheers, mate! FoodPuma 21:01, 27 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Don't worry. From similar experiences I know that there are stressful moments in FAC. Let's try and focus on the article; I for my part will try to give it another read so that I can give more constructive feedback. I'm fairly sure the article has the niveau to get featured. Jakob.scholbach (talk) 21:15, 27 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Una also did nothing to deserve FoodPuma venting frustration (such as this) on her. --Una Smith (talk) 19:33, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Template:Hartshorne AG
There is also a template for Hartshorne citations which you can use. Ringspectrum (talk) 20:02, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Aha. I see there are already others, so you might want to organize them in a category Category:Mathematics source templates or something? Jakob.scholbach (talk) 16:29, 11 March 2009 (UTC)


 * How do I add Category:Mathematics source templates as a subcategory of Category:Specific-source templates? Ringspectrum (talk) 17:19, 11 March 2009 (UTC)


 * You just write into the page. Then you add all references you want to the subcategory by putting  into the template pages. Jakob.scholbach (talk) 17:39, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * See, e.g. Category:Cue_sports_source_templates. Jakob.scholbach (talk) 17:39, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Duality (mathematics)
I'm aboard. My particular interests are in graph theory (the matroid connection), order theory, and computational geometry.—PaulTanenbaum (talk) 17:48, 13 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Good. See you over there, the article is beginning to take shape. Jakob.scholbach (talk) 07:22, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Zeteo
JSTOR now provides a url= field in the bibtex format, which zeteo does not recognize. r.e.b. (talk) 03:36, 24 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Can you give me a sample bibtex snippet, please? I will then fix it. BTW, good to see your work on Riemann hypothesis. I had thought to also contribute, but now I see that I would be of much help... Jakob.scholbach (talk) 10:07, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

JSTOR's bibtex output looks something like this: @article{1935, jstor_articletype = {primary_article}, title = {The Zeros of the Riemann Zeta-Function}, author = {Titchmarsh, E. C.}, journal = {Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences}, jstor_issuetitle = {}, volume = {151}, number = {873}, jstor_formatteddate = {Sep. 2, 1935},    pages = {234--255}, url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/96545}, ISSN = {00804630}, abstract = {}, language = {}, year = {1935}, publisher = {The Royal Society}, copyright = {Copyright © 1935 The Royal Society}, } @comment{ { These records have been provided through JSTOR. http://www.jstor.org } } r.e.b. (talk) 14:21, 24 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I have fixed it. Jakob.scholbach (talk) 21:55, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks; it seems to be working fine. Another minor suggestion: I sometimes accidentally include the "doi:" at the front when cutting and pasting DOIs. Could zeteo quietly remove these (or at least give a warning)? r.e.b. (talk) 14:02, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure, but what exactly do you mean? From where to where are you copying the DOI? Jakob.scholbach (talk) 14:22, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I accidentally enter (say) doi:0123456789 instead of just 0123456789 into the doi field when editing a zeteo entry. This means that the link in the citation template does not work. r.e.b. (talk) 15:28, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The program now exports only "12345679" when the DOI field contains "doi:12345789". OK? Jakob.scholbach (talk) 11:14, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * zeteo doesnt seem to export the doi at all even though it knows it in this case:




 * This might have something to do with the fact that I edited the doi. r.e.b. (talk) 03:30, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * This had something to do with my stupidity... Should work now. Jakob.scholbach (talk) 06:10, 30 March 2009 (UTC)