User talk:Jakob.scholbach/Archives/2011/October

Shapley–Folkman lemma at FAC
Dear Jakob,

Thanks again for the GAR! The article is now at FAC. Best regards, Kiefer .Wolfowitz 23:48, 27 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi again, Jakob!
 * The article has no opposes and three formidable supports, FA juggernaut Malleus Fatuorum and two experienced economists & Wikipedians (Protonk and Volunteer Marek). Protonk suggested that I renew my requests for volunteer reviewers.
 * You seem to be very busy, since I see only Signposts here. I trust that all is well. Good luck on your qualifying/candidacy/thesis exams!
 * Cheers, Kiefer .Wolfowitz 09:53, 7 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your wake-up call. However, in the interest of broad input for the FAC I decided not to review the article once again. Hope that's OK for you. In case you still need more input, I can recommend, , , they are all experienced with featured math content. Be prepared that science/math FACs tend to be open for a long time, because apparently the FAC delegates are afraid that there is not enough qualified input. Jakob.scholbach (talk) 11:26, 7 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the advice, Jakob! I had not thought of Ozob and WillowW. I also appreciate your comment about the length of the process. Best regards,  Kiefer .Wolfowitz 11:36, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 3 October 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 05:19, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 October 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:37, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Idea
Hi Jakob.scholbach, I've just seen your proposal a year ago. I've a question to your skills. You have a German user site. Do you speak German too? Clausthal (talk) 09:55, 22 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Yes, I do. Jakob.scholbach (talk) 13:15, 22 October 2011 (UTC)