User talk:Jakob.scholbach/Archives/2018/May

Logarithm incident
The recent exchanges at the mentioned article and its TP nudge me to come here to say a heartfelt thank you to you for your way to deal with the controversy by taking it to the TP. My efforts to keep up this nice style for a further discussion, after having cleaned up Alsosaid's "New Math", by reacting to your arguments, were, imho sadly, thwarted by the radical reversions by Dmcq. This and the following retaliations by D.Eppstein, Alsosaid and B. Everlasting (I suspect the latter to be a kind of troll!) make me rather withdrawing than contributing. It was my pleasure, even to be disagreeing with you. Purgy (talk) 07:23, 3 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi Purgy, thanks for your message -- enjoying a disagreement is a rare form of appreciation. I also fondly remember our exchanges on the fields article.
 * In my opinion, the discussion on this article got a little heated since Alsosaid's additions had a high speed-consensus ratio. Maybe this has caused other editors to be less discussive than they might otherwise be. In any case, there are tons of articles which do need lots improvement (this one does not so much, IMO), so I am looking forward to meeting at one of those! Jakob.scholbach (talk) 09:03, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Logarithm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Division ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Logarithm check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Logarithm?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 23:04, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 May 2018
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:18, 24 May 2018 (UTC)