User talk:Jakobrebe

Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you. :: Colin Keigher ( Talk ) 07:32, 3 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Uh, yeah, whatever dude. This wasn't a test edit, nor was it vandalism.  Please don't harass me, OK?  THANKS!  Jakobrebe 07:33, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * You are not to edit other users' pages. :: Colin Keigher ( Talk ) 07:35, 3 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Bullshit. Go read the userpage yourself, which says, in bold, "You may edit this page".  Jakobrebe 07:36, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Your edit is hardly constructive. :: Colin Keigher ( Talk ) 07:38, 3 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Also, seeing that your only edits have been solely on Jimbo's page, I can see that you are not here for any constructive edits at all except to prove some point. Read up on WP:POINT and other WP policies. Thanks. :: Colin Keigher ( Talk ) 07:39, 3 January 2007 (UTC)


 * It cites a source, how is it not constructive? Further more, how is abusing rollback tools constructive?  Do tell.  You are the one flagrantly violating policies, giving false "warnings", and telling me I can't edit a userpage which specifically says I can. Jakobrebe 07:40, 3 January 2007 (UTC)


 * This is my user page. I like to keep it a certain way. But, the thing is, I trust you. I trust that you'll add something here that makes me smile, that informs me, or that helps to inform others.
 * Your edits are hardly constructive and fail to inform others. You probably violate WP:SOCK too. :: Colin Keigher ( Talk ) 07:43, 3 January 2007 (UTC)