User talk:Jakub Bialek

I do not see a block on your account. Please post, below here, the exact message you see when you try to edit. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:40, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

You are currently unable to edit Wikipedia. You are still able to view pages, but you are not currently able to edit, move, or create them. Editing from 140.203.12.4 has been blocked (disabled) by Alex Bakharev for the following reason(s): open proxy (see http://www.proxy4free.com/cgi-bin/whois.cgi?domain=140.203.12.4 ) This block has been set to expire: no expiry set. Even if blocked, you will usually still be able to edit your user talk page and email other editors and administrators.


 * It looks to me as though this was once an open proxy, but isn't now. However, my knowledge of proxies is not all that great, so I have posted a request for a check at WikiProject on open proxies/Requests to be sure. Unfortuantely, requests can sometimes take a while to be dealt with, but I hope you won't have to wait too long. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:19, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. In the meantime: can you tell me if using our station's webpage introduction as an entry on Wikipedia (with proper source citing) is an infringement of copy rights? I copied our intro to Wikipedia and put a source link but the bot thinks it is against the rules...
 * It is quite against the rules. The page says "© Copyright Ryan Institute 2014. All Rights Reserved"; please read WP:COPYVIO to get an idea of what you'd need to do to make that material available for Wikipedia. Unless you actually own it, it's one heck of a lot easier to avoid the problem by writing your own material. --jpgordon:==( o ) 15:31, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I can't see that notice: maybe it has been removed. However, the home page at http://www.macehead.org/ says "Copyright © 2014 Atmospheric Physics Research Cluster. All Rights Reserved."
 * Another point to bear in mind is that there is no such thing as giving permission for use only on Wikipedia. Whenever you post anything to anywhere on Wikipedia, by Wikipedia's terms of use you are announcing that you give permission to anyone anywhere in the world to reuse the content, as it is or modified, for commercial or non-commercial purposes, subject to attribution. While the people running an organisation may be willing for a copy of its own web site's account of itself to show on Wikipedia, are they necessarily willing to relinquish control of their material to that extent? The answer is rarely "yes", and it certainly looks improbable that the answer is "yes" in the case of a site which has a notice saying "Copyright xxxxx. All Rights Reserved." In any case, we can't assume that someone who creates a Wikipedia account and says they work for the institution necessarily has the authority to release the material. It is possible to provide the Wikimedia foundation with evidence that you do, but quite frankly it is likely to be easier to just rewrite it in your own words. However, having said that, before you go to any more trouble at all over this, you should carefully consider whether the subject satisfies Wikipedia's notability guidelines. If it doesn't, then any article you write is likely to be deleted, no matter what the copyright situation, and presumably you won't want to waste a lot of time and effort creating an article that is doomed from the start to be deleted. A very quick glance at the results of a Google search suggests to me that it probably does satisfy the notability guidelines, but you may like to think about it to be sure. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:08, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mace Head Atmospheric Research Station


A tag has been placed on Mace Head Atmospheric Research Station requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://macehead.nuigalway.ie/maceinfo.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ww2censor (talk) 23:51, 27 January 2014 (UTC)