User talk:Jalan012

Welcome!
Hello, Jalan012, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page If Your Girl Only Knew has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. A User (contribs) 02:10, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Consideration (song), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sum mer PhD v2.0 03:20, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * It seems you have made a lot of changes to song dates in a very short period of time. Unfortunately, you did not provide a source or reason for the changes in any of your edits. As a result, I am reverting all of your edits. For whatever reason, we seem to get editors making such changes on a fairly regular basis. While some of the edits may be well intended, a disturbingly large number of them turn out to be incorrect. If any/all of your edits are correct, please feel free to restore them, with a citation to a reliable source. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 03:32, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blue (Beyonce song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heaven (song). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''Do not make unsourced date changes. Your edits have been reverted.'' Sum mer PhD v2.0 17:16, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at SMS (Bangerz). Sum mer PhD v2.0 02:39, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Hotline Bling. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Ron h jones (Talk) 00:45, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Vanamonde (talk) 17:42, 30 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Jalan012, you were blocked once for adding unsourced content: when the block expired, you chose to continue the same behavior. I have therefore blocked you again, as there is no evidence that you have learned, and that your disruption will stop. Verifiability is a core policy, and is not optional. You must add reliable sources for any information you add. If you do not heed this warning, the length of your block is likely to increase very quickly. Vanamonde (talk) 17:45, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

January 2017
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. — CYBERPOWER  (Around ) 02:40, 17 January 2017 (UTC)