User talk:Jallikattuman

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Eiichiro oda mangaka.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Eiichiro oda mangaka.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. &mdash; Train2104 (t • c) 22:22, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

This is the Only File Which is in under Fair Use Policy, which is a Picture of the author, though it cannot be used as identification , since he hiding his face in the picture. http://onepiece.wikia.com/wiki/Wanted! <- Check out the One Piece Series Wikia.

Jallikattuman 02:28, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
Hello, I'm Balablitz. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Veeram (2014 film) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 03:56, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
Hello, I'm 1989. I noticed that you recently removed content from One Piece without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 1989 13:52, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at One Piece. ''None of the sources you provided gives any figure other than 350 million copies. If you do not give a specific source that directly states that more than 350 million copies have be sold, you may be blocked for disruptive editing. On Wikipedia, we use the figures that are directly published by reliable sources and the most recent article, which was just a couple of weeks ago, directly states 350 million copies.'' —Farix (t &#124; c) 10:21, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * And frankly, if the publisher directly stated there are 350 million copies were sold as of April 2017, that is the figure we go with. —Farix (t &#124; c) 10:34, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Amvicky. Thank you. —Farix (t &#124; c) 15:27, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

What??? i don't know whos that, i got only one account.Jallikattuman