User talk:Jamco

Dear Sarah or who so ever is concerned now. Jamco (talk) 21:08, 31 July 2014 (UTC)Almost six years have passed, I have seen the page of Communist Party of Pakistan and very surprised to see that true facts about the current status of the Communist Party of Pakistan has not been stated. The current Chairman of the Communist Party of Pakistan is Engineer Jameel Ahmad Malik and not Imdad Qazi. Now the Communist Party of Pakistan is a registered political party under Article 17 of the Constitution of Pakistan, 1973 and Political Parties Order 2002.

I failed to understand who are those people who wrongly give you information and Wikipedia accept the wrong information and don't accept the correct version. Which political party exist in Pakistan, for this Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) is the Authority and you just go on the website of www.ecp.gov.pk and you will find a list of list political parties registered with ECP and you will find at SERIAL NO. 39 the Chairman of the Communist Party of Pakistan is Engineer Jameel Ahmad Malik and not Imdad Qazi and then there is a Gazette notification by Govt of Pakistan in which the symbol for election to political party is allotted by ECP.

OUR party symbol is SICKLE which you can see at Serial No. 97 of the Symbol allotted to political parties. Just take a few minutes and see website of ECP at www.ecp.gov.pk and everything would be clear. So we don't agree with your policy of conflict of interest. When some fact is stated how it can be called conflict of interest. In fact, Wikipedia is betraying the peoples of Pakistan by stating wrong information. Even 6 years back, we told you to rectify your defects but it seems Wikipedia has an interest with Imdad Qazi and his name still appeared as General Secretary whereas the General Secretary of the Communist Party of Pakistan is Meraj Gul Khattak and the list of other office bearers of the Communist Party of Pakistan is given at the party website at www.cpp.net.pk

Keeping in view what has been stated above, you are requested to immediately unblock me so that I can properly correct and edit the errors and mistake in the page of Communist Party of Pakistan. Thanks. Jamco (talk) 21:08, 31 July 2014 (UTC) JAMCO

. --Jamco (talk) 15:43, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Jamco== July 2008 = If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:09, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Blocked
Hi Jamco. I'm sorry but I've blocked your account because you have been edit warring over inappropriate content that you are trying to force into the Communist Party of Pakistan‎ article. Please understand that Wikipedia has content policies like WP:NPOV and verifiability that makes the content you are adding inappropriate for Wikipedia. Please also look at 3RR policy and the WP:COI guideline because if you are who you claim to be you really should leave editing the article to uninvolved editors. I think you would do better posting material like that to a blog or something similar but regardless it not suitable for us and your edits are damaging the integrity of the article and so I have blocked you. Thanks. Sarah 14:02, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Also, Jamco, the block is indefinite but if you state that you have read through the above polices and agree to abide by Wikipedia's policies, to stop edit warring, pov-pushing and disruptive editing, I will give you a second chance and set a fixed term for the block but I can't let you continue editing in the manner you have been. Sarah 14:09, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Dear Sarah!Italic text We failed to understand that you blocked me. It is submitted for your information that again and again it is mentioned in the history of Communist Party of Pakistan that "In 2002, the CPP split, leading to the existence of two separate CPPs, one led by Maula Bux Khaskheli and the splinter-group led by Khadim Thaheem." Italic textare totally wrong facts and misleading statement. Instead of banning and blocking of Sonam, you have blocked Jamco, who is the spoke person of CPP.

Why WEKIPEDIAItalic text is becoming a party. You should delete these remarks like "In 2002, the CPP split, leading to the existence of two separate CPPs, one led by Maula Bux Khaskheli and the splinter-group led by Khadim Thaheem." immediately if you are neutral and not a party with Sonam. We failed to understand who Sonam was and what was his purpose for distorting the history of CPP. Please find some time and read out history of CPP as compiled by CPP itself which is as under:- “History of the Communist Party of Pakistan and its Future Political Strategy in Current Scenario.”

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/socialist_pakistan_news/message/4646

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/socialist_pakistan_news/message/4665

PICTURES OF SEMINAR AT VILLAGE SHAMAS ABAD IN DISTT ATTOCK. (PART I)

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/socialist_pakistan_news/message/4664

PICTURES OF SEMINAR AT VILLAGE SHAMAS ABAD IN DISTT ATTOCK. (PART II)

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/socialist_pakistan_news/message/4663

PICTURES OF SEMINAR AT VILLAGE SHAMAS ABAD IN DISTT ATTOCK. (PART III) LAST ONE.

Dear Sarah, You are requested to kindly see the following party documents of CPP, which are detailed as under:-

Continuous Military Rule in Pakistan - the Challenge for Future!

Contribution to the 15th International Communist Seminar "Present and past experiences in the International Communist Movement." Brussels, 5-7 May 2006 www.wpb.be/icm.htm, wpb@...

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cmkp_pk/message/5117

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/socialist_pakistan_news/message/4388

OPEN LETTER TO THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF PAKISTAN (CJP) AND OTHERS DISTINGUISHED DELEGATES, WHO ARE ATTENDING THE INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL CONFERENCE, BEING HELD ON AUGUST 11 – 14, 2006 IN ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/communistpartyofpakistan/message/148

"SAARC COMMUNIST LEAGUE" SPEECH OF CHAIRMAN CPP IN COLOMBO, SRI LANKA on the 18th National Congress of Communist Party of Sri Lanka Colombo - 25th to 27th of August, 2006.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/communistpartyofpakistan/message/214 Web Addresses:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/communistpartyofpakistan

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cppnews

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cpp_news_urdu

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cpp_news_english

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cpp_news_urdu_columnist

http://www.wpb.be/icm.htm

Dear SARAH,Italic text You are, therefore, requested to kindly lift the ban imposed on me. We hope, you will do justice with our Communist Party of Pakistan. Regards and Thanks. Jamco.


 * Jamco, I am not going to unblock you unless I am sure that you will not immediately resume disruptive editing. At this point, I believe that if I were to unblock you you would go straight back to the CPP article and resume edit warring like you have been doing with your dynamic IPs. Because this disruption has continued with IP addresses, I have now semi-protected the page. I am willing to allow you to resume editing but not until I am sure that you understand the purpose of Wikipedia and will cease your disruptive editing and point of view pushing. The material you want to add to the article is not appropriate for Wikipedia because it is unsourced original research that is unverifiable and editorial comments about our editors. Please read the pages that I linked to above. Also, I don't care who you are - that you claim to be the spokesperson of CPP makes no difference to me because here on Wikipedia you have no more authority over the article than any other user. We only report what reliable third party sources have already published, and we most certainly are not a mouthpiece for political groups. In fact, we would actually discourage you from editing the article at all and instead ask you to make suggestions on the article's talk page but leave the editing to other neutral editors because you have a conflict of interest.


 * You write: "You should delete these remarks...immediately if you are neutral and not a party with Sonam. We failed to understand who Soman was and what was his purpose for distorting the history of CPP." This is a problem. I don't know who you think Soman is but he is not a "party" and his purpose isn't to distort history; he has been an editor on Wikipedia for more than four years now and he works on maintaining the integrity of many articles and removing inappropriate edits. I am concerned about the comments you are making about Soman and the fact that you are locking onto him as though he has done something wrong when he has not. I am also not a "party" with anyone except Wikipedia. My job as an administrator is to protect Wikipedia from people who damage the pages and to try to prevent people from causing disruption and edit warring on pages. If there is an error in the material then we can help you fix it but I simply cannot allow you to continue editing in this manner. You need to work with our editors like Soman instead of working against them, edit warring and writing editorial comments about them into the article as this is considered vandalism here.


 * Again, Jamco, please read the articles I have linked to in my previous message and then we will talk again. Specifically, I need you to look at:
 * Conflict of Interest
 * verifiability
 * Neutral Point of View
 * Please also look at Five pillars for a basic and simple overview of this project. I feel that you have some incorrect assumptions about what Wikipedia is about and you are not going to be effective here if you continue in this manner. There's no way for you to 'win' this dispute and you need to edit within our guidelines and policies or else you are going to find that you are not able to force your preferred changes into the article. Thank you. Sarah 15:06, 7 July 2008 (UTC)