User talk:James.G.Filipavicius

== Subject: Constitutional rights of motorists in the Commonwealth of Australia ==

Any person accused of an offence in Australia must be proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt. The defendent has no onus to prove innocence.

For an offence to be proved there are three criterea; an informant, independent witness & victim.

On two occasions I have provided successfull defence arguements for defendents for a self defence basis:

The State Police Service vs Alexander Filipavicius 6th of May, 2008 Burnie Magistrates' Court Tasmania relating to a radar speed camera traffic offence. The State Police Prosecutor could not produce a witness and the speed camera information information could not be verified. This matter was dissmissed.

Melbourne City Council vs Alexander Filipavicius. Melbourne Magistrates' Court 22nd July, 2008 regarding a parking infringement notice. Again the prosecution could not present a viable witness, to verify the alledged offence was committed. The matter was dissmissed.

There is a matter similar pending for hearing for another defendent with the State Police Force Victoria. This matter cannot be commented on or made public prior to the hearing.

--James.G.Filipavicius (talk) 16:50, 28 July 2008 (UTC)