User talk:James084/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Muchness 17:39, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Test notification
This message is regarding the page Interwiki:Transwiki:pandering. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- SoothingR(pour) 15:34, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

Speedy delete on shit
I've reverted your changes, as well as User:Biscuit and crunch's, on the article shit. The speedy-delete tag was not really appropriate in this case, as Biscuit and crunch had merely scribbled on an existing article (but had not done anything to affect the article's history). Instead, you could have reverted the vandalism.

Please let me know if you have any questions. - jredmond 05:59, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Michael Jordan
This message is regarding the page Michael Jordan. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 01:24, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I would like to point out that I did a revert on the Michael Jordan article and, in fact, did not add anything to the article. My revert was to remove inappropriate comments left by another user.  I am not sure why I received this message.  James084 01:36, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Ooops, sorry about that. I clicked on your name instead of his name and happened to notice that there was no vandalism warning so I added one.  I guess I got confused and I am sorry about that.  I will be more careful in the future. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 01:52, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Redneckistan
Hi, you tagged this article for speedy as nonsense, but I felt it was more suitable for AFD. Kappa 02:06, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for dealing with the vandalism on the Baha'i administration page. -- Jeff3000 15:40, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Test notices
I noticed that you've been placing a few test notices on people's userpages not on their talkpages. I figure its by accident, but I wanted to let you know that (1) its usually better to not edit people's userpages in general (thats what the talkpage is for) and (2) unlike their talk page, edits to a userpage don't pop up the reminder that they have new messages. I just saw the edits because you warned a couple of anons who I am watching because I've blocked them in the past. :) --Syrthiss 16:32, 23 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Not a prob. I've done that before. --Syrthiss 16:36, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Voting for speedy delete on AFD
Hi there, I noticed that you voted to speedy delete Funeral Folk, which is a correct vote. However, if you vote for a speedy deletion, please add the relevant tag to the page, e.g. db-band in this case. This way, administrators will see it faster and it will not be clogging up AFD. I have tagged this page for now.

Thanks for your AFD contributions! Stifle 11:53, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * It is possible to add a speedy tag to a page on AFD, just add it below the AFD block. Stifle 16:19, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

RE. Santa article
Thanks for letting me know! Cheers Knowledge Of  Self  |  talk  19:37, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Kelly Preston revert
Hello. Your revert on this page went back quite a bit too far, so had the side effect of undoing valid changes. I refixed the disambig target, and put back in the children names. The only change that was left was the reference to Secret Admirer. While she did have a part in that, and it was a sex comedy, I don't know if it was a starring role or what her part involved. (So technically that edit could be true, I just don't know, hence why I'm am not putting that back) Was that the part you objected too? If so, your revert message says you reverted the wrong person, who actually just corrected some name links. MartinRe 19:59, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Regarding Checked swing
I removed your CSD note from Checked swing, and cleaned it up briefly. If you still think this article needs to be deleted, please list it at AfD. Thanks! xaosflux Talk  / CVU  04:42, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

1967 in radio
Hi - wondered if you might like to see how this article looks now and possibly consider changing your afd vote...? Grutness...wha?  09:41, 31 January 2006 (UTC)