User talk:James1893

May 2024
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 2024 Scottish government crisis have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:56, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: 2024 Scottish government crisis was changed by James1893 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955708 on 2024-05-01T22:56:11+00:00

May 2024
Hello, I'm Tim O'Doherty. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to 2024 Scottish government crisis have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Tim O&#39;Doherty (talk) 23:05, 1 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I'm new to editing but I see where I went wrong now. I got referred to this page to take a look because it's supposed to be a neutral site and I saw a lot wrong with it and wanted to try and change it. It's pretty obvious that it's been written by someone with a beef with the Scot Parly. It's playing-up the Humza resignation and making a meal of it. It padded out the Bute House text when you've got a whole other article you could just link to and summarise, which looks to me like it was trying to add weight and gravitas to what is essentially a few events in a short period that led to Humza resigning. The title just doesn't belong to the article. The first no confidence didn't happen because he resigned and the other one was never going to succeed. It's really overblown. I understand why someone might want to cover the events on Wikipedia but this is a shameless attempt to use them to undermine the parly. Has the page got restricted access so that all that crap can be removed and put right? James1893 (talk) 05:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of &#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Andrewjmoran. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 15:25, 2 May 2024 (UTC)


 * WTAF James1893 (talk) 23:08, 2 May 2024 (UTC)