User talk:JamesB17

Your opinion is needed in this discussion on Talk:Zeitgeist: The Movie
Hi. I know you started the discussion, but you haven't expressed an opinion on the conflict that has arisen in it. Can you do so? It might help achieve consensus. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 01:09, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Editing
Warning. Particular care must be given by people involved in Zeitgeist things if they are editing the article. Neutral presentation is huge. By reverting things more than three times you have also made yourself subject to an edit ban. Please look at guideline material for editing on Wikipedia. We can not just cut and paste things from primary sources onto articles and also you have to have consensus for contentious things and the article in question concerning Zeitgeist things is controversial. Earl King Jr. (talk) 09:45, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Black Kite (talk) 16:46, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Cut it out
Edits like this are doing your case no favours. AndyTheGrump (talk) 02:05, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Your edits at The Zeitgeist Movement and Zeitgeist: The Movie, including your comments in edit summaries, your comments on discussion pages, and which is intentional vandalism are clearly willfull disruption to make a point. Stop it, or you are facing an indefinite block. --  At am a  頭 13:21, 18 April 2014 (UTC) You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for a clear personal attack seen here. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  At am a  頭 21:25, 27 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Just a formality: Although this issue will be resolved by the time you're unblocked, you were mentioned in passing at WP:ANI. The discussion was about another member, however. Ian.thomson (talk) 04:14, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Hello, I'm Stickee. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Zeitgeist (film series)— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Stickee (talk) 06:17, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Zeitgeist (film series) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. —Frosty ☃ 06:18, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Zeitgeist (film series) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. —Frosty ☃ 06:20, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Zeitgeist (film series). —Frosty ☃ 06:22, 7 December 2014 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 06:34, 7 December 2014 (UTC)